text
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Japan has been boycotting US goods since the 1945 nuclear bombings\n\nQ1: Did Japan import goods from America before 2016?\nA1: Japanese imports from the USA were valued at over US$7.9 trillion in each of the years 2003 to 2013.\n\nQ2: Is there any evidence that Japanese customers refuse to purchase American imports?\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There doesn't seem to be any evidence to suggest a boycott. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Philippine Food and Drug Administration (FDA) “confirmed” the food flavouring monosodium glutamate (MSG) is \"a silent killer\"\n\nQ1: Did Philippine Food and Drug Administration (FDA) “confirm” the food flavouring monosodium glutamate (MSG) is \"a silent killer\"?\nA1: Dr. Eric Domingo, FDA director general, sent AFP this 2006 issuance that lists MSG among “additives permitted for use in food in general”.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence to support. However no dates for claim or question answers. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: You should just ignore a parking charge notice.\n\nQ1: Is paying a parking notice fine an admission of guilt in the UK?\nA1: Yes, because paying is seen as admitting the ticket was right\n\nQ2: Can you appeal a parking notice fine in the UK?\nA2: Yes, because How to appeal depends on the type of parking ticket you have - check what the ticket says before you start.\n\nQ3: Should parking charge notices be ignored?\nA3: Ignoring official correspondence from reputable companies, such as Gemini Parking Solutions, could lead to an unnecessary and completely avoidable court cases.\n\nMany motorists believe that parking charges levied by parking companies are illegal and can be ignored without consequence. Several high profile online forums perpetuate this by continuing to post misleading advice and suggesting that motorists who have illegally parked, tear up their fine letter, rather than deal with it responsibly. However this is simply not true. Those motorists who choose to ignore these notifications could find themselves in court.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The evidence shows that you should not just ignore a PCN, as you may end up in court\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Penalty charge notices are usually issued by the police or councils, while parking charge notices are invoices issued by private companies.\n\nQ1: Who issues Penalty charge notices in the UK?\nA1: A PCN is a penalty for contravention of parking regulations. It can be paid, contested by appeal, or contested by defending a claim for payment under the small claims track of the county court.\nYou won’t get a criminal record or points on your licence.\nEverything from how PCNs are served, through appeal or payment, to debt recovery is laid down in regulations. PCNs are used for some moving traffic offences too, particularly in London – bus lanes, no entry, restricted turn, yellow box junction.\nYou may get a PCN by post, by hand or applied to your car windscreen.\nYou’ve got 28 days to pay or challenge.\nA PCN can be up to £70 outside London, and up to £130 in London.\nThe penalty is usually halved if paid within 14 days.\nAn unpaid PCN penalty is treated as a civil debt and you could be pursued through the county court system or even get a visit from the bailiff if the debt remains unpaid. Some local authorities don’t have civil parking enforcement powers and in these areas parking is enforced by the police or police-employed traffic wardens who will issue a Fixed Penalty Notice (FPN) enforced through the criminal justice system.\n\nQ2: Who issues Parking charge notices in the UK?\nA2: A parking ticket for private land is called a Parking Charge Notice (PCN) – check your ticket for this wording.\n\nYou might get a parking ticket on private land from the owner or a company employed to manage the car park if you:\n\npark without the owner’s permission, or\nbreach any parking conditions imposed by the owner. \nThere may have been signs displaying the rules for using the car park. When you park on private land (like a private car park) you enter into a contract with the landowner. Any signs that clearly display rules for using the car park give you the terms of the contract. The car park owner can take steps to enforce any of these rules if broken.\n\nQ3: what is a penalty charge notice\nA3: A Penalty charge notice is a penalty for contravention of parking regulations.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: This is true, according to the answers, parking charge notices are issued by private companies who run car parks. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Martin Lewis, the founder of Money Saving Expert, recommends ignoring parking charge notices.\n\nQ1: What advice did Martin Lewis recommend as regards parking charges\nA1: He adviced that if you've broken the rules, pay up.\n\nQ2: What is Martin Lewis' stance on unfair parking charges\nA2: If you get an unfair ticket in a private car park, don't automatically pay it. These supposed 'fines' handed out are merely invoices, often unenforceable, and so we've three routes to fight unfair tickets\n\nQ3: Has Martin Lewis previously confirmed that an older version of this claim does not represent his advice?\nA3: yes. Lewis tweeted a fake claim and pointed out that it did not represent his advice.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The person in the claim themselves is shown in Q&A 3 to have tweeted that this is a fake claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Filmmaker Anurag Kashyap, via Facebook chat under the username Anurag Safar, engaged in sleazy behaviour in 2014\n\nQ1: Does Facebook user Anurag Safar claim to be filmmaker Anurag Kashyap?\nA1: No, because Safar wrote on replied on facebook to comments about him being Anurag Kashyap that stated, 'I am NOT Kashyap. I have my own strong identity with Safar Surname'",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: They are not the same person. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Dog meat was seized at Nashik railway station in India\n\nQ1: Was dog meat photographed being seized at Nashik railway station in India?\nA1: No, because Food officials stated that Rotten meat was seized from Chennai railway station which is not Nashik railway station and it was not dog meat",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The question implies this was dog meat. It should have asked if dog meat was seized at Nashik.\nThe answer to the question is, instead, appended with \"and it was not dog meat\".\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Climate activist from India Disha Ravi's sister manages her Twitter account after her arrest\n\nQ1: Does Disha Ravi have a sister?\nA1: She is a single child and does not have a sister\n\nQ2: Who is the Disha Ravi the claim refers to?\nA2: A Climate activist from India.\n\nQ3: Did someone claim to be her sister on a twitter account?\nA3: Yes, because Friends of Disha Ravi say this account is *not* connected to her.\n\nQ4: Was Disha Ravi arrested?\nA4: disha ravi, a 21-year-old climate activist, was arrested by delhi police for sharing a toolkit @GretaThunberg posted in support of the #farmersprotest.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: If she doesnt have a sister then her sister can not run her account.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: BJP president Amit Shah said that the days of serving biryani to terrorists are over\n\nQ1: What event is being referred to here?\nA1: the BJP President was referring to a fabricated story propagated by the public prosecutor of the 26/11 trial, Ujjwal Nikam. During the trial, Nikam, who had argued on behalf of the state, had manufactured a story about Ajmal Kasab being fed biryani in jail to counter an emotional wave supposedly being created in Kasab’s favour. “Kasab neither asked for biryani nor it was served by the government. I concocted it just to break an emotional atmosphere which was taking shape in favour of Kasab during the trial of the case”, Nikam said, speaking to the media in 2015.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and source show that the claim is false so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The coronavirus has a life cycle of 12 hours.\n\nQ1: How long is the life cycle of covid-19?\nA1: new coronavirus (COVID-19) can live in the air for several hours and on some surfaces for as long as 2-3 days",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Covid-19 cycle can be shorter or longer than the claim, so its not true. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: COVID experts at Mumbai’s Nanavati Hospital have said the following four treatments are given to coronavirus positive patients — warm water with lemon, ginger and jaggery mixed with ghee, hot milk with turmeric and steam once a day.\n\nQ1: Does water infused with lemon, ginger and turmeric help in destroying Coronavirus\nA1: Also, the virus is present in the epithelial lining of the stomach, which has a high acidic content. Exposing the virus to the acid in the stomach would have no effect on the virus or against the infection. Therefore, drinking, gargling or steaming hot water, even if the water is mixed with herbs such as turmeric or salt, will not destroy the virus.\n\nQ2: How was Covid 19 being managed in India\nA2: Like every other country, the Indians also resulted in the use of pharmaceutics and modern medications and not the use of water infused with certain plants",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: QA Pairs state not a treatment type.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Video clip showing police entering people’s homes by force committing atrocities on Kashmiris, India.\n\nQ1: What is the origin of the video clip allegedly showing police entering people’s homes by force committing atrocities on Kashmiris in India?\nA1: During a protest against electricity loadsheding in Faisalabad, police entered the houses of protesters and manhandled their women.\n\nQ2: Where did the incident in the video occur?\nA2: Faisalabad",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Answer states video is from a different town (Kashmiris in claim vs Faisalabad in answer.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A tweet portrays actor Ali Fazal celebrating Intelligence Bureau staffer Ankit Sharma’s death in Delhi riots.\n\nQ1: Did Ali Fazal tweet to celebrate Intelligence Bureau staffer Ankit Sharma’s death in Delhi riots?\nA1: No the viral tweet is a photoshop from a previous made tweet dated 2 months prior.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Evidence shows that the tweet was photoshopped.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Manoj Tiwari a member of the Indian Legislative assembly said, “Petrol would cost Rs. 200 today had the Modi government not been in power\"\n\nQ1: When did Manoj Tiwari say 'Petrol would cost Rs. 200 today had the Modi government not been in power\"?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: What is the current cost of India's petrol in February 2021?\nA2: Rs 100 per liter is currently the highest price in some parts of India.\n\nQ3: Was the claim tweeted by a reliable source?\nA3: No, because It was posted by a user who posts fake news. 100% Fake News. Parody. Tweets are only for fun",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Refuted as fake news.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A 14-hour curfew will help to break the chain and curb the further spread of the coronavirus.\n\nQ1: How long can coronavirus live on surfaces?\nA1: viable virus\ncould be detected in aerosols up to 3 hours post aerosolization, up to 4 hours on copper, up to 24 hours on\ncardboard and up to 2-3 days on plastic and stainless steel\n\nQ2: What was the reasoning for the 14 hour curfew?\nA2: That the corona virus life is 12 hours on a surface, so a 14 hour curfew will break the chain of coronavirus spread.\n\nQ3: How long can corona virus live on surfaces\nA3: Research (Doremalen et al 2020) published in the New England Journal of Medicine conducted by American scientists (preprint here) suggests that the new coronavirus (COVID-19) can live in the air for several hours and on some surfaces for as long as 2-3 days. They tested the virus by spraying into the air by a nebuliser mimicking the coughing action of an infected person. They found that it could be detected up to a minimum of 3 hours later in the air, up to 4 hours on copper surfaces, up to 24 hours on cardboard and up to 2-3 days on plastic and stainless steel surfaces.\n\nQ4: Does the inability to detect the virus mean its not present\nA4: Finally, the inability to detect the virus (under the detection threshold) is not equivalent to the complete elimination of the virus. However, to acquire an infection, one needs a minimum threshold or level or viral exposure",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: A 14 hour curfew would not help break and curb further spread of coronavirus, especially when a virus can live up to 24 hours on\ncardboard and up to 2-3 days on plastic and stainless steel.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Both the HIV virus and the coronavirus spread by direct contact and people should avoid touching the infected.\n\nQ1: At the time of the claim what was official advice on how HIV is transmitted between humans?\nA1: HIV can be transmitted via the exchange of a variety of body fluids from infected people, such as blood, breast milk, semen and vaginal secretions. HIV can also be transmitted from a mother to her child during pregnancy and delivery.\n\nQ2: At the time of the claim did official advice say HIV can be transmitted between humans by touch?\nA2: Individuals cannot become infected through ordinary day-to-day contact such as kissing, hugging, shaking hands, or sharing personal objects, food or water.\n\nQ3: At the time of the claim what was official advice on how coronavirus spread between humans?\nA3: In March 2020 WHO explained the following. According to current evidence, COVID-19 virus is primarily transmitted between people through respiratory droplets and contact routes. Droplet transmission occurs when a person is in in close contact (within 1 m) with someone who has respiratory symptoms (e.g., coughing or sneezing) and is therefore at risk of having his/her mucosae (mouth and nose) or conjunctiva (eyes) exposed to potentially infective respiratory droplets.\n\nQ4: Does both HIV virus and the coronavirus spread the same way by direct contact and people should avoid touching the infected ?\nA4: HIV and COVID spreads in different ways and not the same.\nThe novel coronavirus (COVID-19) transmits mainly via respiratory droplets that people sneeze, cough, or exhale, in addition to touching contaminated surfaces or people and subsequently touch the face.\n\nHIV does not spread by touching. It can spread by unprotected sex, transfusion of blood contaminated with HIV and from a mother to the child during gestation and delivery.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Individuals cannot become infected with HIV through everyday contact.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Hot lemon can cure all cancers. The acids and carboxylic acids contained in lemon juice can regulate high blood pressure, protect narrow arteries, regulate blood circulation and reduce blood clotting.\n\nQ1: What can hot lemon cure\nA1: Lemon can cure asthma and help patients with norovirus but nothing to prove that it cures cancer\n\nQ2: Can lemons cure cancer?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: Can eating lemons cure cancer?\nA3: No answer could be found.\n\nQ4: Can lemon juice cure cancer?\nA4: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: while the answers say there is no evidence it cures cancer, there is no evidence provided in the sources to prove there is no evidence. there is just one source \n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Casein, the main protein in milk, causes cancer.\n\nQ1: What is casein?\nA1: A mixture of related phosphoproteins occurring in milk and cheese. The group is characterized as one of the most nutritive milk proteins, containing all of the common amino acids and rich in the essential ones.\n\nQ2: Is casein a known carcinogen?\nA2: It is not listed as a caronigen by IARC or NTP\n\nQ3: What does the Continuous Update Project say about milk studies?\nA3: Dairy and cancer\nObserved inverse associations between intake of dairy products and colorectal cancer development have been largely attributed to their high calcium content. In addition to calcium, lactic acid-producing bacteria may also protect against colorectal cancer,\n\nwhile the casein and lactose in milk may increase calcium bioavailability. Other nutrients or bioactive constituents in dairy products, such as lactoferrin, vitamin D (from fortified dairy products) or the short-chain fatty acid butyrate may also impart some protective functions against colorectal cancer, but these require much better elucidation.\n\nThe CUP Panel concluded that the evidence was generally consistent for dairy products, milk, cheese and dietary calcium, and showed a decreased risk of colorectal cancer with higher consumption.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: the second answer shows Casein isn't listed as a known carcinogen and evidence suggests that milk may protect against cancer. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: As of February 2016, there has been no load shedding (due to power outages) in South Africa, since August of the previous year.\n\nQ1: Has there been any load shedding (due to power outages) in South Africa, since August 2015?\nA1: South Africa’s state-owned utility Eskom (which supplies more than 90% of the country’s electricity) has implemented rotational load shedding for years, but during December 2019 and the beginning of January 2020, it became a daily occurrence.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There has been load shedding during December 2019 and the beginning of January 2020.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: To curb water wastage, the Department of Water and Sanitation has begun its programme of training 15,000 young people as artisans\n\nQ1: How many people was South Africa's Department of Water and Sanitation training in February 2016?\nA1: The War on Leaks project aimed to train 3000 people in 2015/6.\n\nQ2: How many people did the War on Leaks project aim to train in total?\nA2: \"War on Leaks project... is expected to run over a five-year period whereby 15 000 unemployed youth will be trained within three disciplines, namely water agents, artisans and plumbers.\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers and sources show that the program aims to train 15,000 people so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Jacob Zuma stated that South Africa had experienced no load shedding carried out by power utilities since August 2015.\n\nQ1: Is it true that South Africa had not experienced load shedding carried out by power utilities since August 2015?\nA1: According to a media statement by power utility Eskom, there was load shedding on 14 September 2015. South Africa is again experiencing these rotational power outages as Eskom’s shortage of capacity continues. The utility says there’s a possibility load shedding will remain for the next 18 months.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Seems from the answer that the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Late musician Prince designed the first Nike Air Jordans.\n\nQ1: Who designed the first Nike Air Jordans ?\nA1: Peter Moore was the man behind the Air Jordan 1 (and also helped design the Air Jordan II). When Michael Jordan first looked at the AJ I, his response was “I’m not wearing that shoe. I’ll look like a clown”. With time, the shoe slowly grew on him. The original Air Jordan 1 retailed at $65.00.\n\nQ2: What year did Late musician Prince died ?\nA2: In the weeks since the 57-year-old singer was found dead at his suburban Minneapolis compound, on 21 April, investigators have been looking into whether he had a prescription drug problem.\n\nThis surprised friends and family members, who said Prince avoided alcohol and drugs and maintained a healthy lifestyle.\n\nOn Thursday, however, medical examiner A Quinn Strobl released the office’s assessment of Prince’s cause of death: “self-administered fentanyl”, a powerful opioid. The office said it could not offer further comment.\n\nIn a press release, the Carver County sheriff’s office said it “continues its investigation”.\n\nEarlier on Thursday Minneapolis Star Tribune reported that Prince died of a painkiller overdose.\n\nThe official autopsy and toxicology reports have yet to be released.\n\nPrince was last seen alive around 8pm on 20 April, when he was dropped off by an acquaintance at Paisley Park, his sprawling compound in Chanhassen, Minnesota, his longtime hometown. Two staff members appeared at the residence early on the following day, and discovered his body in an elevator on the first floor.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: As per information in the 1st q&a, Peter Moore designed the original Nike Air Jordan, not Prince.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Musician Prince invested in Nike in 1971.\n\nQ1: When was the first nike shoe made\nA1: 1971 was a big year for the company. Along with the name change, Co-Founder Bill Bowerman created the first Nike shoes, the waffle trainers\n\nQ2: When did Nike start trading publicly\nA2: Nike’s stock was launched to the public markets in an initial public offering (IPO) on December 2, 1980.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It ssems that NIKE was not an IPO until the 80s, therefore the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Musician Prince recruited Michael Jordan to the company Nike in 1983.\n\nQ1: Who recruited Michael Jordan to Nike\nA1: Michael Jordan said it was [Nike employee] George Raveling",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim refers to \"Musician Prince,\" which is not addressed in any of the question and answer pairs. The source offers conflicting opinion on who recruited Michael Jordan to Nike, and appears authoritative about the the different parties involved. There is no mention of the Musician Prince in the source article. It also refers to 1984 as the year talks were had about Jordan joining Nike, not 1983 as per the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: WhatsApp's CEO has appealed to all users to remove their profile picture within the next 20-25 days, and users should forward the message to all, especially women as Isis is planning on stealing profile pictures for misuse in their terrorist activities.\n\nQ1: Do ISIS use WhatsApp?\nA1: Most don't tend to use iMessage or WhatsApp.\n\nQ2: Has ISIS hacked WhatsApp?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: Can WhatsApp be easily hacked into?\nA3: WhatsApp comes equipped with end-to-end encryption, which should prevent any outside spying on the communications.\n\nQ4: Did the WhatsApp CEO warned users to change their display picture as it could be misused by terrorists, hackers and ISIS ?\nA4: The claim is false. The message is being circulated since 2016.Further, neither the WhatsApp CEO nor the Delhi Police has issued any such official notice.According to WhatsApp, unsolicited messages from unauthorized third parties come in different forms such as spam, hoax and phishing messages. These messages are sent with the intention of deceiving the user and prompting them to act in a certain way.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: this is not true \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: These stones were tied by prophet Mohammed 1400 years ago,\n\nQ1: Is there a sculpture of two rocks tied with a piece of rope?\nA1: Yes. A sculpture of two rocks suspended from rope was created by Sha'ban Abbas in 2008. It is on display at Cairo Airport in Egypt.\n\nQ2: Does the image of a rock with rope, shown on Facebook claiming to be created 1400 years ago, match the image of a sculpture by Sha'ban Abbas?\nA2: yes. The image on facebook really shows the sculpture created in 2008.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The sources show that the sculpture is a modern sculpture so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Two stones in Egypt, one carrying the other have been tied 1400 years ago by SAW.\n\nQ1: Is a Rock statue located in Egypt?\nA1: A Rock Sculpture is located at Cairo Airport, Egypt.\n\nQ2: Who created the rock sculpture at Cairo airport, Egypt?\nA2: Artist Sha’ban Abbas.\n\nQ3: When was sculpter Shaaban Mohamed Abbas born?\nA3: 7 November 1969",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The sculpture referred to in the claim couldn't have been built more than 53 years ago as that's when the artist who made it was born.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Congress has raised the minimum wage only once in the last 18 years but raised their own salaries nine times.\n\nQ1: When was this claim made?\nA1: 17/12/2015\n\nQ2: Has the US minimum wage been increased since 1997?\nA2: Yes, because 01/09/1997\n24/07/2007\n24/07/2008\n24/07/2009\n\nQ3: Have members of the US Congress had salary increases since 1997?\nA3: Specific\nlegislation was last used to provide increases in 1990 and 1991. It was the only method used by\nCongress for many years",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A 2 states that minimum wage has increased at least 4 times not once as claimed, Q&A 3 states that congress has made motions for increasing their wages with motions being denied many times.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Donald Trump's father was a member of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK).\n\nQ1: Was Donald Trump's father ever connected with the KKL?\nA1: Yes, because According to a New York Times article published in June 1927, a man with the name and address of Donald Trump's father was arraigned after Klan members attacked cops in Queens, N.Y.\n\nQ2: Is there proof that Donald's Trump father was part of the KKK?\nA2: No, because There is no solid proof to suggest Donald Trump's father was part of the KKK.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is evidence that Donald Trump's father was connected with the KKK but there is no evidence that he was part of it.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Donald Trump's Grandfather was a pimp and a tax evader.\n\nQ1: Trump's Grandfather Was A Pimp And Tax Evader Or That His father A Member Of The KKK?\nA1: Most families of enormous wealth have a dark and sometimes scandalous, even monstrous past. Donald Trump's clan is no exception to that rule. His grandfather was a pimp and a tax evader, his father a racist who would in the course of his life, clash with New York City Police as a member of the Ku Klux Klan and then as a wealthy real estate magnate, refuse to rent to people of color.\n\nDonald Trump's legacy is anything but a rag to riches story. His dad kicked the bucket with $250-$300 million in the bank. The man who wants to ban all people of a particular religion from travel wasn't born with a silver spoon in his mouth, his was white gold. The only thing more obnoxious than Donald Trump himself, is his family's money-grubbing, bigoted history.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and source do support this claim by showing the history of his grandfather.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Side effects of the HPV vaccine outweigh the positives\n\nQ1: What is the HPV vaccine used to prevent?\nA1: It is a vaccine that helps protect the body against infection with certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV)\n\nQ2: Have any negative side effects of the HPV vaccine been reported?\nA2: - soreness, swelling and redness in their arm where the injection was given.\n- headache, or feel sick in their tummy or have a slight temperature.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The second answer and source show that there are side effects from the vaccine but they are only minor so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Trump said, 'Some Africans are lazy fools only good at eating, lovemaking and stealing'\n\nQ1: When is Donald Trump meant to have said this?\nA1: 2015\n\nQ2: Did Donald Trump say ''Some Africans are lazy fools only good at eating, lovemaking and stealing'' in 2015?\nA2: In the case of this article the intention seems to be satire.\n\nQ3: Where did the claim originate from?\nA3: This claim was first posted on 25 October 2015 on Politica, a fake news website.\n\nQ4: Is there any proof that Donald Trump said this on the date in the claim, on any of his social media platforms, or was it reported in the news?\nA4: No, because His Twitter feeds do not mention it, and no news channels report it.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Claim is fake from a satire news website.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sitaram Yechury the Communist Party of India leader, called Chinese President Xi Jinping, his boss.\n\nQ1: Did the tweet in question appear on Sitarum Yechury's twitter account?\nA1: No, because There were no results on the official twitter account",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The source shows that there were no tweets on Sitaram Yechury's twitter account so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Belakwa, a town in New York was abandoned after routine hydrofracking left its soil toxic and its aquifer irreparable.\n\nQ1: Where is Belakwa town located?\nA1: There is no town of Belakwa, New York, and a sign lamenting its abandonment due to fracking was part of an art installation.\n\nQ2: Was Belakwa, New York, abandoned due to hydrofracking?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: Is Belakwa a town in New York?\nA3: There is no town called Belakwa in New York.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A 1 states the town in the claim apparently abandoned was only a fictitious town that was part of an art installation, Q&A 3 states no such town exists so could not have actually been abandoned or had is soil ruined by fracking.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Donald Trump said 'I Will Revoke The U.S. Citizenship Of All Puerto Ricans,'\n\nQ1: Can the president of the United States revoke the citizenship of an individual\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: Does Donald Trump think that Puerto Ricans are not U.S. citizens and as such will be able to revoke their citizenship\nA2: Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump, while speaking to a group of investment bankers and hedge fund owners in New York City, allegedly declared that if elected, he will revoke the U.S. citizenship of all Puerto Ricans because they are “not part of the American race.”\n\nQ3: Did Donald Trump, while a presidential candidate, say \"I will revoke the U.S. citizenship of all Puerto Ricans\"?\nA3: No the story was published on a satire news website.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Satire.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Cuban authorities found the S.S. Cotopaxi fully intact and floating toward the island nation more than 90 years after its disappearance.\n\nQ1: When was the S.S. Cotopaxi found?\nA1: On November 29, 1925, the S.S. Cotopaxi set sail from Charleston, South Carolina, with a cargo of coal and a crew of 32. Charting a course for Havana, Cuba, the ship ran afoul of a tropical storm brewing near the Bermuda Triangle two days later and promptly disappeared.\n\nNow, nearly a century later, a team of shipwreck hunters says it has finally identified the battered boat’s remains off the coast of St. Augustine, Florida, putting to bed decades of myths, ghost stories and seafaring lore that inevitably sprung up in the interim.\n\nQ2: When were the boat remains later identified as those of the SS Cotopaxi ship found?\nA2: Researchers actually unknowingly homed in on the S.S. Cotopaxi’s marine graveyard nearly 35 years ago. The site, called Bear Wreck by fishers and divers, had long been known to contain a sunken ship, but scientists had struggled to pinpoint the vessel’s identity.\n\nQ3: Was the SS Cotopaxi ship fully intact when it was found?\nA3: No, because The SS Cotopaxi ship was wrecked and not fully intact.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It was found, but a lot earlier and not intact and floating. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The quote \"If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.” Was said by former US president John Quincy Adams.\n\nQ1: Is John Quincy Adams quoted as saying: \"If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader.”?\nA1: There is no record of him ever saying this in his diaries or writings.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is no evidence that former US president John Quincy Adams quoted, \"If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more, and become more, you are a leader.\" Hence, the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Last Post song originated on an American Civil War Battlefield.\n\nQ1: What is the origin of the last post\nA1: The Last Post is one of a number of bugle calls in military tradition which mark the phases of the day. Where ‘Reveille' signaled the start of a soldier's day, the ‘Last Post' signaled its end.\nIt is believed originally to have been part of a more elaborate routine, known in the British Army as ‘tattoo', that had its origins in the 17th century. During the evening, a duty officer had to do the rounds of his unit's position, checking that the sentry posts were manned, rounding up the off-duty soldiers and packing them off to their beds or billets. He would be accompanied by one or more musicians. The ‘first post' was sounded when the duty officer started his rounds and, as the party proceeded from post to post, a drum was played. The drum beats told off-duty soldiers it was time to rest. If the soldiers were staying in a town, the beats told them it was time to quit the pubs.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer shows that the origin of the music is from the UK so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The APC promised to make a naira equal in value to a dollar during the 2015 election campaign.\n\nQ1: Is making the Naira equal to the Dollar in the Manifesto of APC\nA1: No there is nothing like that in the manifesto\n\nQ2: What did APC leadership say about the claim\nA2: Director, Policies and Strategy of the APC campaign group, Bolaji Abdullahi, made the clarification on Tuesday at the Nigeria Political Parties Discussion Series (NPPDS) organised by the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD) said that Buhari never made such a statement during the course of his campaign",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The QA brings fairly straight forward but definitive evidence that the claim was not made and the APC have nothing like that in the manifesto either making this claim refuted as false.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Sharia principles are to become enshrined in the UK legal system for the first time\n\nQ1: What is this claim based on?\nA1: A practice note issued by the Law Society issued in 2014 as advice for solicitors.\n\nQ2: Has the Law Society commented on this claim?\nA2: Yes, because 1/3 Reports that the Law Society is promoting 'Sharia Law' are inaccurate and ill informed\n\nQ3: Does Sharia Law have any jurisdiction in England?\nA3: No, because Justice Secretary Chris Grayling confirmed that shariah law had “no jurisdiction in England and Wales”.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It seems from the question and answer pairs, that the sharia law does not apply in the uk, therefore the label is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Garlic has proven 100 times more effective than antibiotics.\n\nQ1: What is the report on garlic being proven to be 100 times more effective than antibiotics?\nA1: WSU researchers recently reported that diallyl sulfide, a compound found in garlic, is 100 times more effective than the antibiotics erythromycin and ciprofloxacin in killing the toxic bacteria Campylobacter jejuni.\n\nQ2: How does the garlic compound diallyl sulfide kill bacteria?\nA2: The garlic compound diallyl sulfide is able to dissolve the biofilm and kill the cowering bacteria underneath 'Campylobacter jejuni' which is hard to kill because it produces a slimy protective biofilm that helps it repels antibiotics and stick to surfaces. \n\nCampylobacter jejuni is the most common cause of food poisoning in the United States. Food poisoning strikes over 2.4 million Americans each year and symptoms include stomach pains, cramping, diarrhea and fever.\n\nDiallyl sulfide combines with a sulfur containing enzyme in the bacteria. This changes the enzyme’s function and shuts down cell metabolism; killing bacteria better and faster than antibiotics!\n\nQ3: Have there been other studies investigating whether garlic has antiviral properties?\nA3: Yes, because One, being \"Garlic for the Common Cold\", whose objectives are to determine whether garlic (Allium sativum) is effective for the prevention or treatment of the common cold when compared to placebo, no treatment, or other treatments.\n\nQ4: Did the \"Garlic for the Common Cold\" study find garlic to have antiviral properties?\nA4: The study was inconclusive.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The WSU study supports the \"100 times more effective\" claim in relation to one bacterium but the claim is broader than that.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A child in Barbados has contracted AIDS by eating a pineapple that a vendor had bled upon.\n\nQ1: Did a 10 year old Barbados boy contract aids by eating a pineapple that had the vendors blood on?\nA1: No answer could be found.\n\nQ2: How is Aids Transmitted?\nA2: The following are the means by which the HIV virus is spread:\n\nVertical transmission. HIV can be spread to babies born to, or breastfed by, mothers infected with the virus.\n\nSexual contact. In adults and adolescents, HIV is spread most commonly by sexual contact with an infected partner. The virus enters the body through the lining of the vagina, vulva, penis, rectum, or abraded or irritated tissues in the lining of the mouth through sexual activity.\n\nBlood contamination. HIV may also be spread through contact with infected blood. However, due to the screening of donated blood for evidence of HIV infection, the risk of acquiring HIV from blood transfusions is extremely low.\n\nNeedles. HIV is frequently spread by sharing needles, syringes, or drug use equipment with someone who is infected with the virus. Transmission from patient to health care worker, or vice-versa, through accidental sticks with contaminated needles or other medical instruments, is rare.\n\nNo known cases of HIV/AIDS have been spread by the following:\n\nSaliva\n\nSweat\n\nTears\n\nCasual contact, such as sharing food utensils, towels, and bedding\n\nSwimming pools\n\nTelephones\n\nToilet seats\n\nBiting insects (such as mosquitoes)\n\nQ3: Can you catch Aids by eating something with an infected persons blood on it?\nA3: No, because As per the report on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, one cannot get HIV from consuming food handled by someone with HIV. Even if the food contained small amounts of HIV-infected blood or semen, exposure to the air, heat from cooking, and stomach acid would destroy the virus. Though it is very rare, HIV can be spread by eating food that has been pre-chewed by someone with HIV. The contamination occurs when infected blood from a caregiver’s mouth mixes with food while chewing. The only known cases are among infants.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A pairs state that blood does pass HIV to others, but that eating food contaminated with HIV infected blood should not pass on infection. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: British Parliament banned lipstick in 1770 for the fear that it had the power to seduce men into marriage.\n\nQ1: Has there ever been a ban on lipstick by the UK Parliament\nA1: A search of lipstick on the website, JustisOne, an extensive legal database that contains British parliamentary acts dating back to 1707. shows no result of such",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: It s33ms like lipsti k was never banned. Therefore the claim is refuted \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 56 girls died because of using whisper, Stayfree and other sanitary protection.\n\nQ1: Can wearing pads for too long cause any health risks\nA1: Other factors that increase the risk of vaginal yeast infections include stress, washing your genitals with soap, wearing synthetic and tight clothes, sweating and using “non-breathable” panty liners or sanitary pads.\n\nQ2: Can wearing sanitary pads for too long lead to cancer\nA2: It is true that synthetic materials of the types used in some high-absorbency feminine sanitary products can trap heat and dampness, which may promote the growth of yeast and bacteria and (in rare cases) create the potential for toxic shock syndrome, but that issue is associated with the use of tampons rather than sanitary pads",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: QA pairs make no reference to 56 girls dying or if Whisper, stayfree or other Sanitary protection companies/products have specific health risks.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: During Mike Bloomberg's tenure, street homelessness in NYC decreased by 28%.\n\nQ1: What was this claim based on?\nA1: The City of New York's Mayors Management Report 2013.\n\nQ2: What did The City of New York's Mayors Management Report 2013 conclude about homelessness?\nA2: The Homeless Outreach Population Estimate (HOPE), a yearly\ncensus conducted by the Department of Homeless Services and its\npartners, found 3,180 homeless people on the street the night the\ncensus was conducted in January 2013, a four percent reduction\ncompared to Fiscal 2012. Since Fiscal 2009, the population\nestimates have been up and down but relatively constant on\naverage. In the long-term the estimate of those living on the street in\n2013 is 28 percent lower than the baseline established in 2005. By\ncontrast the sheltered homeless population has risen in the short term, from an average of 39,673 in FY2012 to 47,084 in FY2013,\nand by 34% since Fiscal 2005\n\nQ3: did the coalition officer make a statement on the decreased homelessness\nA3: Yes, because in a interview, he confirmed this claim",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: t seems the homelessness did indeed decrease, therefore the label is supported\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: If an unmarked car tries to pull you over, you should dial 112 to confirm it’s actually a police officer because the number provides \"a direct link to state trooper info,\" and that \"this applies in all 50 states.\"\n\nQ1: Is 112 an emergency number in the U.S?\nA1: No, because U.S only uses “911” as its emergency contact number\n\nQ2: If dialling 112 in the U.S will a caller be transferred to the emergency services?\nA2: 1-1-2 is an international number.\n\nSo, 1-1-2 is indeed an emergency number- but for Europe, not America. so dialing 1-1-2 in the U.S. will get you to 9-1-1.\n\nQ3: What number should you call in the U.S if you feel unsafe being pulled over by an unmarked police car?\nA3: Call 9-1-1 if you have concerns about the person pulling you over (i.e. if they are in an unmarked car or you would like to see another officer or want to reach a safe location.)",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The number 112 does not provide a direct link to state trooper info. Also the number 112 may reroute to the 911 emergency services but it may not. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Eating black garlic reduces the chances of developing cancer.\n\nQ1: What are the claimed health benefits of black garlic?\nA1: The health benefits of black garlic are almost the same as white garlic BUT the fermentation process is said to enhance even further the amazing properties of the “regular” one. In a way it can be considered a kind of super-garlic. Or, in mathematical terms, as a to square white garlic.\nThe compound S-allylcysteine, a natural component of fresh garlic and a derivative of the amino acid cysteine, is found in much greater concentrations in black garlic. This compound is thought to help lower cholesterol and decrease the risk of cancer.\nWhite garlic is praised throughout the world for its anti-microbial, antibiotic and anti-fungal. All properties that are attributed to allicin. Black garlic’s S-allycysteine improves the absorption of allicin, boosting protection against infections.\n\nQ2: Have these health benefits been verified?\nA2: the majority of research on black garlic’s health benefits has been conducted on laboratory animals, so there is still a lack of scientific evidence to support the use of black garlic for health purposes on humans.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Although black garlic may have more enhanced properties to white garlic and also contain properties to lower cholesterol and reduce the risk of cancer, there is not enough proved evidence to support the use of black garlic for health purposes on humans.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Ghana’s two dominant political parties, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) and National Democratic Congress (NDC) are both laying claim to the Free Senior High School (SHS) programme, a social intervention project meant to improve access to education.\n\nQ1: Did Former President John Mahama started the Free SHS Policy ?\nA1: The Free Secondary High School (Free SHS) education policy in Ghana was a government initiative launched by President Nana Akuffo-Addo in September 2017. The policy was part of Nana Addo’s campaign messages during Ghana's 2016 election period, and has become an essential part of Ghana's educational system. The policy's core themes of access, equity and equality fulfill the United Nations modified Sustainable Development Goals, where member countries amalgamate those themes in their educational systems to certify adequate learning experiences for students.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: This claim is refuted. President Nana Akuffo-Addo started the Free SHS Policy, not Former president John Mahama.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Marijuana could be making teens less intelligent.\n\nQ1: Does marijuana affect adolescent intellectual development?\nA1: Yes, because According to a 2012 study: \"Neuropsychological testing was conducted at age 13 y, before initiation of cannabis use, and again at age 38 y, after a pattern of persistent cannabis use had developed.Persistent cannabis use was associated with neuropsychological decline broadly across domains of functioning, even after controlling for years of education. Informants also reported noticing more cognitive problems for persistent cannabis users. Impairment was concentrated among adolescent-onset cannabis users, with more persistent use associated with greater decline.\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and source show that this claim is true and the source is credible.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Section 233 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), pertains to self-defence of the individual and rape crimes against women in India.\n\nQ1: What is Section 233 in the Indian Penal Code?\nA1: Section 233 in The Indian Penal Code\n\n233. Making or selling instrument for counterfeiting coin.—Whoever makes or mends, or performs any part of the process of making or mending, or buys, sells or disposes of, any die or instrument, for the purpose of being used, or knowing or having reason to believe that it is intended to be used, for the purpose of counterfeiting coin, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A 1 shows that The section of penial code shown in the claim relates to counterfeiting currency, not rape and self defence as claimed\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Woman in a video was mixing urine in food, she was Muslim and employed by a Hindu.\n\nQ1: Is there a report of a woman who mixed urine into the food of her employer\nA1: Asha Kaushal (55), a resident of Bagh Mugalia locality, allegedly laced urine in the food at the kitchen of her employers Surendra Garden residence\n\nQ2: Why did Asha Kaushal mix urine into the food of her employer\nA2: Asha mentioned several reasons, including the employer's alleged undesirable behavior towards her younger daughter\n\nQ3: Was Asha Kaushal a Muslim, working in a Hindu household?\nA3: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers do not show any evidence for whether she was a Muslim and whether her employer was a Hindu so I can't support or refute the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: You can get HIV/AIDS from contaminated fruit.\n\nQ1: Can you get HIV from consuming food handled by someone with HIV ?\nA1: You can’t get HIV from consuming food handled by someone with HIV\n\nQ2: Can you catch HIV by eating fruit contaminated with blood by an HIV infected person?\nA2: You cannot get it from consuming food handled by an HIV-infected person; even if the food contained small amounts of HIV-infected blood or semen, exposure to the air, heat from cooking, and stomach acid would destroy the virus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The first Q&A pair state that you cant get HIV from contaminated food.\nwhich somewhat refutes the claim.\nThe 2nd Q&A pair state that even fruit (as claimed) that is contaminated by HIV cannot spread the virus to those who eat it, which fully refutes the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Cadbury India is giving away free chocolate basket gift Hampers to celebrate their 70th Anniversary\n\nQ1: Does Cadbury India have a giveaway promotion for its 70th anniversary?\nA1: No, because Cadbury does not offer a free chocolate basket gift hamper for its 70th anniversary\n\nQ2: How old is Cadbury?\nA2: Cadbury was founded in 1824",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Anniversary amount does not match the year established and no free gift hampers were offered.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenya only handles about 300,000 of the cases filed to the Kenyan court annually.\n\nQ1: Over the last five financial year, what is the average number of settles cases?\nA1: It shows an average of 321,652 cases settled across the five financial years.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Seems from the question and answer pair that the claim is supported\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Kenya has an average of 400,000 cases being filed in courts every year.\n\nQ1: How many court cases are filed each year in Kenya?\nA1: Financial year\tCases\n2014/15\t334,685\n2015/16\t460,961\n2016/17\t344,180\n2017/18\t402,243\n2018/19\t484,349\nAverage\t405,283",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Assuming the claim date of 1922 is an error and should be 2022, the stats from 2014 to 2019, it is reasonable to assume that the claim statement of 400,000 is a reasonable assessment.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Kenyan judiciary does not even get 1% of the national budget.\n\nQ1: Who is the chief justice of Kenya?\nA1: The second Chief Justice under the 2010 constitution is C.J Maraga\n\nQ2: Has the chief justice of Kenya stated what the judiciary receives from the national budget?\nA2: C.J Maraga, who assumed office in 2016, asked for more funding as he said “the judiciary does not even get 1% of the national budget” In an interview",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The second answer and source shows that the judiciary does get less that 1% so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: There is a ‘global average’ for the number of judges and magistrates to number of people per country.\n\nQ1: How are global averages calculated?\nA1: To allow for population differences in countries usually an average is based on per 100,000 people.\n\nQ2: What is the ‘global average’ for the number of judges and magistrates to number of people per country?\nA2: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Whilst the first Q&A pair gives some details on how an average is calculated, the only other Q&A offers no answer to what is claimed and so no evidence is shown to refute or support the claim\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In Kenya in 2022, a population of about 48 million people has just one judge per 300,000 people.\n\nQ1: How many people live in Kenya?\nA1: The population has grown to 47.6 Million in 2019\n\nQ2: How many judges do they have in Kenya ?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: So how many people are there for each judge?\nA3: No answer could be found.\n\nQ4: What is the judge-population ratio in Kenya?\nA4: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is no evidence found to the number of judges in Kenya or their ratio to the population.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In Kenya a population of about 48 million people has just one magistrate per 77,000 people.\n\nQ1: When was this claim made?\nA1: 20/08/2020\n\nQ2: What is the population of Kenya?\nA2: 2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census Results\nThe total enumerated population was 47,564,296\n\nQ3: How many judges does Kenya have?\nA3: As of June 2019 Kenya had 153 judges.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&A 2 confirms the population figure shown for Kenya at the time of the claim, Q&A 2 shows the number of judges in Kenya, (no explanation is given on if a magistrate is a judge in Kenya,) but also no calculation is shown for the total of the figures shown (which is around 1 judge for every 300 thousand people)\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: An American newborn is the first baby in the world to be born with Coronavirus antibodies\n\nQ1: Are there any earlier cases of babies being born with COVID antibodies?\nA1: Yes, because There have been three reported cases in China although they have not been verified\n\nQ2: Is there any indication that the baby in the US was the first one to be born with Covid antibodies?\nA2: It seems to be the first case where the mother is vaccinated, however it seems that the newborn is unlikely to get his antibodies from the mother. Therefore, the answer is no.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Previous examples exist in the QA pair.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Patanjali CEO, Acharya Balkrishna, never claimed that its Coronil kit was a cure for COVID-19.\n\nQ1: Has the Patanjali covid-19 cure been approved?\nA1: No, because A 17-member taskforce, formed to investigate the efficacy of yoga guru Baba Ramdev’s ‘Covid cure’ kit, has suggested to the Modi government that Patanjali Ayurveda should not sell its ayurvedic medicines as “Covid-19 cure”, ThePrint has learnt. \n\nThe taskforce has told the Ministry of AYUSH in its report that the company should first complete the clinical trials and it should sell the medicines only for those conditions, such as treating cough and fever, for which it has sought the approvals.\n\nQ2: Did Patanjali release a covid-19 vaccine?\nA2: Patanjali Ayurved has launched the ‘Coronil and Swasari’ medicine with the claim that it has discovered a cure for COVID-19.\n\nQ3: What is Patanjali?\nA3: It is an Ayurvedic drug manufacturing company.\n\nQ4: What claims did Patanjali make about it's covid-19 medicine?\nA4: The firm claimed its medicine has shown 100 per cent favourable results during clinical trials on COVID-19 patients, except those on life support systems.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Claimed it has shown 100 percent effectiveness and also that it is a cure as stated in 2 of the answers.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Karnataka CM, HD Kumaraswamy blames India for terrorism crisis.\n\nQ1: What did Times Now report that Kumaraswamy said?\nA1: \"we have to solve the terrorism crisis on our country first.\"\n\nQ2: Was Kumaraswamy speaking in English?\nA2: No, he was speaking Kannada.\n\nQ3: Are there alternative translations of what Kumaraswamy said?\nA3: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The 1st Q&A pair points to the claim being refuted, however the 2nd and 3rd Q&A pairs state that the translation in Q! could be misrepresented as it is a translation.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Mosquitoes kill 2,740 people every day.\n\nQ1: What fatal diseases are caused by mosquitos?\nA1: Malaria is a parasitic infection transmitted by Anopheline mosquitoes. It causes an estimated 219 million cases globally, and results in more than 400,000 deaths every year.\n\nQ2: How many people die from mosquito borne diseases a day?\nA2: 400,000 + 40,000 = 440,000\n440,000/365 = 1,205\n\nWHO estimates 1,205 per day.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The data shows the number of people dying is a lot less than 2470 per day. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Stay-at-home orders “actually are the law of these states.”\n\nQ1: Are there any states in the U.S that view stay at home orders as laws\nA1: Yes, because Some of those states include, California, Illinois, Hawaii, Delaware and some others",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Yes there are states where there is a stay at home order and it is the law, so this claim is supported. \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Labour’s manifesto would have cost half of HS2.\n\nQ1: Which country has an HS2 project?\nA1: HS2 is Government’s proposed new high-speed rail line in the UK.\n\nQ2: What political parties exist in the UK?\nA2: -The Conservative Party\n- The Labour Party\n-The Liberal Democrats\n-Scottish National Party\n-Reform UK\n\nQ3: What is the cost of the UK's HS2 in 2022?\nA3: As of 2019 HS2 is expected to cost £156.95 billion\n\nQ4: What is the UK labour party's latest manifesto costing as of 2022?\nA4: The Labour party manifesto includes plans for an £83 billion increase in day-to-day spending and compensation for the WASPI women at a cost of up to £58 billion",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim is refuted by the question-answer pairs\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Almost 5.5 million British people live permanently abroad.\n\nQ1: How many british people live over seas?\nA1: 5.5 million people from Britain live overseas and 2,000 a week leave the UK",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer supports the claim and is supported by the source.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Theresa May said sex offenders, including paedophiles, should be allowed to adopt.\n\nQ1: Did Theresa May support paedophiles and sex offenders adopting?\nA1: Helen Reece, a reader in law at the London School of Economics, called on Theresa May, the Home Secretary, to relax rules which automatically ban sex offenders from caring for children, saying that this could breach their human rights.\nThe law was looked at but Theresa May did not specify that she supported it.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Did not say she supported it but did look at the law when asked.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: On June 7, 2005, \nJeremy Corbyn\n voted to exempt tower blocks built before 2007 from requiring sprinklers.\n\nQ1: What votes were held in the House of Commons on 7th June 2005?\nA1: None.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No votes were held in the House of Commons on the 7th of June 2005\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: People were stabbed at protests in London over the weekend of 13 June.\n\nQ1: were there any reported stabbings at any protests in London on the 13th June 2022?\nA1: London's Met Police confirmed 'We have not received any reports of a stabbing in relation to today's protests'",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence to suggest the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Elephant dung is a cure for COVID-19.\n\nQ1: Does Elephant dung have medicinal properties?\nA1: Some traditional healers say elephant dung has healing properties including for treating headaches, toothaches and blocked sinuses\n\nQ2: Has elephant dung been known to help with Covid-19?\nA2: Health Minister Kalumbi Shangula said COVID-19 currently has no known cure.\n\n“If anybody claims as such, it must be treated as a false claim,”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No evidence to support.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: or the first time ever, an African passport is among the top five most powerful in the world. Revealing this on Monday on its website, the Henley Passport Index released its ranking for the year 2020 and Nigeria had a dramatic rise from being at the 95th spot to going up to the 5th most powerful knocking out both Spain and Denmark and tying with Luxembourg.\n\nQ1: According to the Global passport index, where does Nigeria rank?\nA1: 82nd\n\nQ2: According to the Henley Passport index, where does Nigeria rank?\nA2: 95th",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The source mentions that the Henley Passport index for 2020 ranked Nigeria 94th.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 5G can suppress the immune system, thus making people more susceptible to catching the Coronavirus.\n\nQ1: What are the health risks of 5G on the human body?\nA1: To date, and after much research performed, no adverse health effect has been causally linked with exposure to wireless technologies. Health-related conclusions are drawn from studies performed across the entire radio spectrum but, so far, only a few studies have been carried out at the frequencies to be used by 5G.\n\nTissue heating is the main mechanism of interaction between radiofrequency fields and the human body. Radiofrequency exposure levels from current technologies result in negligible temperature rise in the human body.\n\nAs the frequency increases, there is less penetration into the body tissues and absorption of the energy becomes more confined to the surface of the body (skin and eye). Provided that the overall exposure remains below international guidelines, no consequences for public health are anticipated.\n\nQ2: Does 5G reduce immunity and cause COVID-19?\nA2: No, because Claims state 5G weakens the immune system, making it easier to contract COVID-19, or that it directly causes the virus. Simply put, research emphasizes that the belief that 5G causes or can spread COVID-19 isn’t true.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: research shows that 5G doesn't pose adverse health effects on public\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: There is pork in Covid-19 vaccines.\n\nQ1: What is covid-19 vaccine made of\nA1: The active substance is BNT162b2 RNA, lipids, salts, sugar and water",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: there is no pork in Covid-19 vaccines\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Nando's serve only chicken dishes made from halal chicken in their UK restaurants.\n\nQ1: How many Nando's restaurants are there in the UK?\nA1: Nando's have 434 restaurants in the UK.\n\nQ2: How many of the UK restaurants serve only halal chicken?\nA2: ...76 ... of which serve only Halal chicken and are signposted both in the restaurant and online. A small proportion of chicken sold in our other restaurants may also be Halal. This may happen on rare occasions if there are, for example, issues with supply. However, all of our chickens are packaged, labelled and distributed to their intended restaurant.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim gives official wording that not all restaurants serve halal only, which is the claim.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: New Zealand’s MPs took a 20% pay cut during this pandemic.\n\nQ1: Did the New Zealand government announce a 20% cut in pay?\nA1: Yes, because New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced that she and her ministers would be met with a 20% cut to their pay for the next 6 months.\n\nQ2: What was the pay cut percentage for MP's?\nA2: 10 per cent for MPs",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers are correct but do not clarify that the 20% reduction was for ministers and the 10% for Mp's. By not clarifying , the answers appear to contradict each other. \n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Joe Biden then US former vice president in 2015 pressured the Ukrainian government to fire Viktor Shokin, the top Ukrainian prosecutor, because he was investigating Ukraine’s largest private gas company, Burisma, which had added Biden’s son, Hunter, to its board in 2014.\n\nQ1: Was Victor Shokin investigating Burisma?\nA1: No, because In 2015, the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine took the unprecedented step of telling the country it should fire prosecutors who were blocking an investigation of the owner of Burisma, where Hunter Biden was reportedly earning $50,000 a month.\n\nQ2: Was Hunter Biden part of Burisma Board?\nA2: Yes, because That Joe Biden's son Hunter was a member of the board of Burisma was only a decoration of no significance.\n\nQ3: Why was Victor Shukin fired?\nA3: In the eyes of many Ukrainians, his biggest failure was that nobody from the former regime was prosecuted for the killing of protesters here on Independence Square.\nParliamentarian Yehor Soboliev was the first official to demand the prosecutor's dismissal.\n\nAnother reason was failure to investigate grand corruption of Yanukovych. Ukrainian prosecutor general's office didn't want to help to provide evidence.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is no evidence that Joe BIden pressured the Ukrainian government to fire Viktor Shokin\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Diane Abbott said that Chairman \"Mao did more good than harm.\"\n\nQ1: Did Diane Abbott say that Chairman \"Mao did more good than harm.\"?\nA1: Yes, because Diane Abbott can be heard saying on a 2008 episode of This Week ,\"I suppose that some people would judge that on balance Mao did more good than harm; you can’t say that about the Nazis.\" When responding to host Andrew Neil's question on \"Why is it right to wear a Maoist t-shirt, but obviously wrong, because it is, to wear a Hitler t-shirt?\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: confirmed with source of where and when.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: An MP’s salary was £66,000 in 2010 and £77,000 in 2018.\n\nQ1: How much were MP's Paid in 2010?\nA1: £65,738\n\nQ2: How much were MP's Paid in 2018?\nA2: £77,379",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Q&As establish that claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A recipe for a drink called Kashayam is the cure for the Coronavirus.\n\nQ1: What is the recipe for Kashayam in the claim?\nA1: A mixture of turmeric, cloves, lemon with skin, ginger with water.\n\nQ2: What is kashayam?\nA2: The word means decoction. It is a home made cure made from any combination of herbs and spices.\n\nQ3: Are there any medicines that can cure the new coronavirus?\nA3: No, because To date, there is no specific medicine recommended to prevent or treat the new coronavirus.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is no evidence that any of these ingredients in this drink could cure coronavirus. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Did Conservative MP, Mark Francois deny the existence of the gender pay gap?\n\nQ1: Did Mark Francois deny the existence of the gender pay gap in parliament?\nA1: No, because there is no record in Hansard of Mark Francois stating this.\n\nQ2: Did Mark Francois deny the existence of the gender pay gap outside of parliament?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: Whilst speaking in the UK House of Parliament, did Mark Francois deny the existence of the gender pay gap ?\nA3: Hansard records all speeches made in the UK Houses of Parliament. Hansard has no record of Mark Francois mentioning the gender pay gap.\n\nQ4: Whilst speaking outside the UK House of Parliament, did Mark Francois deny the existence of the gender pay gap ?\nA4: No answer could be found.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: There is no record of the MP saying anything about the gender pay gap and there is no info if they said anything outside of the houses of parliament so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Doctors in Israel and the medical company, Gomorra, have found a “100% cure for HIV.\n\nQ1: What does The World Health Organisation state on its HIV/AIDS Fact Sheet under the Key Facts heading?\nA1: WHO's Fact Sheet for HIV AIDS dated 14 July 2021 states:\nThere is no cure for HIV infection.\n\nQ2: What is Gomorra's connection to Israeli company, Zion Medical?\nA2: Israeli company Zion Medical released a press statement claiming to have found a “potential” cure for HIV using the drug called Gammora after what it said was a 10-week trial of the drug.\n\nQ3: What is Bhekisisa?\nA3: The Bhekisisa Centre for Health Journalism is an independent media organisation that specialises in narrative, solutions journalism focusing on health and social justice issues across Africa. Our stories are distributed through News24, the Daily Maverick and the Mail & Guardian and reach policymakers, academics, activists and political leaders, often resulting in shifts in policy, setting national agendas and defining conversations. Trained in evidence-based journalism, our reporters and editors use peer-reviewed journal studies and reliable statistics to support the narratives in our stories.\n\nQ4: What did Zion Medical's press release on October 31, 2018 claim?\nA4: TEL AVIV, Israel, Oct. 31, 2018 /PRNewswire/ -- Zion Medical, an Israeli biotech company developing HIV and cancer treatments, has announced the results of the first clinical trial of HIV-drug Gammora, eliminating up to 99% of the HIV virus within four weeks of treatment.\n\nQ5: What clinical trials did Zion Medical claim to have carried out with Gamorra?\nA5: Between July and August 2018, Zion Medical conducted a Phase 1/2a human clinical trial of Gammora, reaffirming results of prior preclinical tests that had showed the safety and effectiveness of the drug in killing HIV-infected cells. In Part I of this trial, nine HIV-infected patients at the Dr. Ronald Bata Memorial Hospital in Entebbe, Uganda, ...\n\nQ6: What was Bhekisisa's comment re the trials conducted by Zion Medical with Gammora?\nA6: Zion Medical’s “trial” was carried out at Dr Ronald Bata Memorial Hospital in Entebbe, Uganda, the company says in its release. There is no such trial registered in Entebbe, according to a search of the site ClinicalTrials.gov.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim needs a closing quotation mark. But the evidence provided refutes the claim. \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A series of photos showed the supposed interiors of Del Monte Land Transport Bus Company's (DLTB Co) new bus.\n\nQ1: Who posted the original pictures?\nA1: Joyous Journey (JJ) Express Bus Company\n\nQ2: Does DLTB's new bus match with the images?\nA2: No, because The photos and videos of DLTB's new bus do not match with the bus in the image claim.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The photos of the supposed interior of the bus are from a bus company based in Myanmar, not DLTB.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: A person does not need a West African Examination Council [WAEC] certificate to become the President of Nigeria.\n\nQ1: Do you need a West African Examination Council [WAEC] certificate to become the President of Nigeria?\nA1: The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 states that to become the Head of State,\nA person shall be qualified for election to the office of the President if –\n(a) he is a citizen of Nigeria by birth;\n(b) he has attained the age of thirty-five years;8\n(c) he is a member of a political party and is sponsored by that political party; and\n(d) he has been educated up to at least School Certificate level or its equivalent. (Sec. 131)\n\nQ2: What is meant by certificate of education or equivalent in The Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 part on head of state qualifications?\nA2: - service in the public or private sector in the Federation in any capacity acceptable to the Independent National Electoral Commission for a minimum of ten years \n\n- attendance at courses and training institutions as may be acceptable to the Independent National Electoral Commission for periods totaling up to a minimum of one year, \n\n- the ability to read, write, understand and communicate in the English language to the satisfaction of the Independent National Electoral Commission, \n\n- any other qualification acceptable by the Independent National Electoral Commission.”",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answers below do not mention the WAEC certificate is needed so the claim is supported.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 24,641 die of heart disease every day.\n\nQ1: How many people die from Cardiovascular disease each year?\nA1: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the number 1 cause of death globally, taking an estimated 17.9 million lives each year.\nSo 490,411 a day",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and source show that the amount of deaths is higher than the claim so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Trump's government delivered the largest tax cut and reform in the history of the USA\n\nQ1: How much of the GDP was the tax cut of the Donald Trump government\nA1: It was 0.9% of the GDP\n\nQ2: Are there other tax cuts that are higher than Donald Trump's government tax cut\nA2: Yes there are several and they include \nEconomic Recovery Act of 1981 (Reagan): 2.89 percent\nRevenue Act of 1945 (Truman): 2.67 percent\nRevenue Act of 1948 (Truman): 1.87 percent\nAmerican Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (Obama): 1.78 percent\nRevenue Act of 1964 (Johnson): 1.6 percent\nTax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2010 (Obama): 1.31 percent",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The second answer and source shows that there are other governments that made more tax cuts so the claim is refuted.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Ilocos Norte Governor Imee Marcos graduated cum laude from the University of the Philippines (UP) College of Law\n\nQ1: Did Imee Marcos attend the University of the Philippines College of Law?\nA1: Yes, because Madrileña de la Cerna: \"In the first place, we learned that her admission to the college was questionable because she did not finish her undergraduate studies at Princeton but was admitted just the same with intense pressure on the administration (whose admission policies are very strict).\"\n\nQ2: Did Imee Marcos graduate from UP College of Law?\nA2: No, because It was a public knowledge during my stay in the campus that Imee could not graduate because she lacked 35 units.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The answer and credible source show that the governor went to the University but did not graduate.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: In 2010, a newly qualified teacher’s salary was £21,500 and in 2018 was £22,000.\n\nQ1: How much was the minimum pay for teachers in 2017\nA1: £22,917\n\nQ2: What was the basic salary of a teacher in 2010\nA2: £21,588",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Sees that in 2017 the wage was slightly higher, therefore the claim is refuted\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Waving the British flag will result in arrest for breach of the peace.\n\nQ1: Can you get arrested for waving the British flag?\nA1: No, because but, in Northern Ireland it has had a long history of it being politically and socially controversial to display various flags, including the Union flag.\n\nQ2: Has Northern Ireland had laws criminalizing the display of flags?\nA2: Yes, because The Police Service of Northern Ireland has said it will treat the erection of loyalist flags in a mixed area of south Belfast as a breach of the peace.\n\nQ3: Is it illegal to wave the British flag?\nA3: There are no laws on flags in the UK though. Not on land anyway",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim does not give a country or place that relates to the claim. The answers related to Northern Ireland, but Northern Ireland is not mentioned in the claim. \n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 108 people died from Covid-19 in China on February 10th, one of the worst days so far.\n\nQ1: How many people died from Covid 19 on the 10th February 2020?\nA1: Data reported on the 11th February 2020 for the previous 24hr period shows 108 new deaths in China from Covid 19.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The figure of 108 is extracted from the WHO's daily situation report dated 11th February.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: For a cumulative 29 years out of 60 years of existence as a nation, Nigeria has been under military rule.\n\nQ1: When was Nigeria under military rule?\nA1: Nigeria was first under military rule from 1966 to 1979, so 13 years.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: 13 years of military rule, plus 16 more years of the same, is 29 years as claimed.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Boris Johnson said in 2007 that Gordon Brown should not have become Prime Minister after Tony Blair with no public vote.\n\nQ1: Is Boris Johnson quotes as saying that Gordon Brown should not have become Prime Minister after Tony Blair with no public vote?\nA1: yes he said:\n\n\"They voted for Anthony Charles Lynton Blair to serve as their leader. They were at no stage invited to vote on whether Gordon Brown should be PM.\"",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The statement was made by Boris Johnson \n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Covid-19 cases are way down from where they were two weeks ago, this weekend is one of the lowest the United States have had.\n\nQ1: Which weekend is Trump referring to in this claim?\nA1: 9th and 10th of May 2020.\n\nQ2: What were the number of new cases reported across that weekend in the United States?\nA2: No answer could be found.\n\nQ3: Did the numbers decline significantly in May 2020?\nA3: The national percentage of respiratory specimens testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 at public health, clinical and commercial laboratories decreased from week 21 to week 22; however, percent positivity increased slightly in four regions.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The charts in the source for answer 3 show a drop in positive Covid-19 tests of just 1 or 2 percentiles (~7% to 6%) between weeks 20 and 22. I would not describe this as \"way down\".\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Covid-19 tests detect any coronavirus, not just the one that causes Covid-19.\n\nQ1: Do Covid-19 tests detect other types of coronavirus (non-Covid-19)?\nA1: Research carried out in 2020 showed that the existing Covid-19 tests did not give positive results in the presence of other Covid viruses.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: 2020 research states other covid viruses do not show up in the tests.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: UK suicides have increased 200% under lockdown.\n\nQ1: When was this claim made?\nA1: 01/08/2022\n\nQ2: When did lockdown start in the UK?\nA2: 23/03/2020\n\nQ3: What statistics on UK suicides were available on 01/08/2020?\nA3: Provisional data for 2019.\n\nQ4: Do The Samaritans have any data for suicides since the start of lockdown in the UK at the the of this claim?\nA4: There is currently no evidence of a rise in suicide rates. However we know that many people are struggling with their mental health during this difficult time and we’re here 24/7 for whoever needs us.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: No Numbers showing suicide numbers. for the lockdown dates.\n\nverdict: 'Not Enough Evidence'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: NASA has announced the possibility of the sun rising from the west\n\nQ1: Why is the claim suggesting the sun would start to rise in the west?\nA1: the belief that magnetic pole reversal that could lead to the earth spinning in the opposite direction.\n\nQ2: Does a magentic pole reversal cause the sun to change where it rises?\nA2: No, because The earth rotation is not affected by a magnetic change",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Magnetic pole changes do not change the way the sun rises.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: 26,383 people die of cancer each day.\n\nQ1: What is the daily mortality rate for people with cancer?\nA1: According to the World Health Organisation's (WHO) International Agency for Research on Cancer, there were 9.6 million deaths from cancer in 2018. That works out to around 26,000 deaths a day worldwide.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The Q&A pair show a trustworthy sources figure which matches very well to the claim figure.\n\nverdict: 'Supported'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The former actor and Congress politician, Urmila Matondkar, said, \"By abusing martyr Rajiv Gandhi, Modi has proved he is mentally ill.\"\n\nQ1: Did Urmila Matondkar say, \"By abusing martyr Rajiv Gandhi, Modi has proved he is mentally ill.\"?\nA1: No, because Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel stated that Modi was mentally unstable. There are no reports of Urmila Matondkar ever making such a comment.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Seems from the QA that Congress politician did not make the claim. Therefore the claim is refuted \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Wuhan is where 5G was rolled out first.\n\nQ1: Was Wuhan one of the first places to get 5G?\nA1: Wuhan, capital of Hubei, is one of the first pilot cities of the 5G network in China.\n\nQ2: Were there other areas that had the 5G pilot trails in them ?\nA2: China Mobile, the world’s largest mobile operator in terms of subscribers, had plans to carry out external field test in the cities of Hangzhou, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Suzhou, and Wuhan and deploy more than 100 base stations in these locations. China Mobile also has said it would conduct 5G network application demonstrations in 12 cities including Beijing, Chengdu, and Shenzhen.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: The claim is cherry picking as Wuhan was one of a few cities that had the trials.\n\nverdict: 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: Israeli Prime minister Netanyahu confirmed Israel is responsible for the Beirut Explosion.\n\nQ1: What caused the Beirut explosion\nA1: An uncontrolled fire in an adjacent warehouse ignited ~2,750 tons of Ammonium Nitrate (AN), producing one of the most devastating blasts in recent history\n\nQ2: Did the Israeli government take responsibility for the blast\nA2: Israel’s Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi told Israeli N12 television news that the explosion was most likely an accident caused by a fire and that they had nothing to do with it\n\nQ3: What did Israeli prime minister say concerning the Beirut blast\nA3: Prime Minister Netanyahu pointed out that in order to prevent disasters like the one that occurred at Beirut port, the explosives and missiles that Hezbollah has hidden must be removed from all concentrations of civilian population in Lebanon.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Israel’s Foreign Minister Gabi Ashkenazi told Israeli N12 television news that the explosion was most likely an accident caused by a fire and that they had nothing to do with it \n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
[
{
"content": "Your task is to predict the verdict of a claim based on the provided question-answer pair evidence. The possible labels are: 'Supported', 'Refuted', 'Not Enough Evidence', 'Conflicting Evidence/Cherrypicking'. Justify your answer using the provided evidence and select the correct label.\n\nClaim: The Covid-19 spike protein which the Pfizer vaccine causes an immune response against also trains the body to attack syncytin-1, a protein in the placenta, which could lead to infertility in women.\n\nQ1: Are COVID-19 Vaccines Going To Cause Infertility?\nA1: Someone has claimed that the COVID-19 vaccines are going to cause infertility because of a shared amino acid sequence in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and a placental protein, which will make the immune system attack both as it can’t tell the difference. The truth? This sequence is too short for the immune system to meaningfully confuse it with placental proteins. It’s sort of like saying that you are going to be confused with a criminal because you wear a commonly sold red bracelet that was also found on the criminal. It’s not realistic. If this were true, we would also expect COVID-19 to cause early pregnancy loss a significant amount of the time. The evidence available to us does not support that this is the case. There is no reasonable basis to believe that vaccines against COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 will affect fertility.",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "justification: Someone has claimed that the COVID-19 vaccines are going to cause infertility because of a shared amino acid sequence in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and a placental protein, which will make the immune system attack both as it can’t tell the difference. The truth? This sequence is too short for the immune system to meaningfully confuse it with placental proteins. It’s sort of like saying that you are going to be confused with a criminal because you wear a commonly sold red bracelet that was also found on the criminal. It’s not realistic. If this were true, we would also expect COVID-19 to cause early pregnancy loss a significant amount of the time. The evidence available to us does not support that this is the case. There is no reasonable basis to believe that vaccines against COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2 will affect fertility.\n\nverdict: 'Refuted'",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |