"{\"id\": \"10010084\", \"name\": \"Ernest CARUTHERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent\", \"name_abbreviation\": \"Caruthers v. State\", \"decision_date\": \"1994-11-22\", \"docket_number\": \"No. 65685\", \"first_page\": \"476\", \"last_page\": \"476\", \"citations\": \"891 S.W.2d 476\", \"volume\": \"891\", \"reporter\": \"South Western Reporter Second Series\", \"court\": \"Missouri Court of Appeals\", \"jurisdiction\": \"Missouri\", \"last_updated\": \"2021-08-10T20:51:08.795272+00:00\", \"provenance\": \"CAP\", \"judges\": \"Before GRIMM, C.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER, and REINHARD, JJ.\", \"parties\": \"Ernest CARUTHERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.\", \"head_matter\": \"Ernest CARUTHERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.\\nNo. 65685.\\nMissouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.\\nNov. 22, 1994.\\nMotion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied Jan. 3, 1995.\\nApplication to Transfer Denied Feb. 21, 1995.\\nDavid C. Hemingway, Asst. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.\\nJeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John R. Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.\\nBefore GRIMM, C.J., and CARL R. GAERTNER, and REINHARD, JJ.\", \"word_count\": \"148\", \"char_count\": \"961\", \"text\": \"ORDER\\nPER CURIAM.\\nMovant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief which was denied without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for them information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).\"}"