Answer: 15810.0

Question: What is the sum of the Professional and consulting fees for Amount in the years where Depreciation and amortization is positive for Amount? (in thousand)

Context:
MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) Had compensation expense for employee stock-based awards been determined based on the fair value at grant date consistent with SFAS No.123(R), the Company’s Net income (loss) for the year would have been increased or decreased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

	Year Ended December 31,

	 2005	 2004	2003

Net income

As reported	$8,142	$57,587	$4,212

Compensation expense	1,366	1,965	1,646

Pro forma	$6,776	$55,622	$2,566

Basic net income (loss) per common share	$0.29	$6.76	$-2.20

Diluted net income (loss) per common share	$0.23	$1.88	$-2.20

Basic net income (loss) per common share — pro forma	$0.24	$6.48	$-2.70

Diluted net income (loss) per common share — pro forma	$0.19	$1.82	$-2.70

 Basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) in 2003 includes the effect of dividends accrued on our redeemable convertible preferred stock. In 2003, securities that could potentially dilute basic EPS in the future were not included in the computation of diluted EPS, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive. See Note 12, “Earnings Per Share”. Revenue Recognition The majority of the Company’s revenues are derived from commissions for trades executed on the electronic trading platform that are billed to its broker-dealer clients on a monthly basis. The Company also derives revenues from information and user access fees, license fees, interest and other income. Commissions are generally calculated as a percentage of the notional dollar volume of bonds traded on the electronic trading platform and vary based on the type and maturity of the bond traded. Under the transaction fee plans, bonds that are more actively traded or that have shorter maturities are generally charged lower commissions, while bonds that are less actively traded or that have longer maturities generally command higher commissions. Commissions are recorded on a trade date basis. The Company’s standard fee schedule for U. S.  high-grade corporate bonds was revised in August 2003 to provide lower average transaction commissions for dealers who transacted higher U. S.  high-grade volumes through the platform, while at the same time providing an element of fixed commissions over the two-year term of the plans. One of the revised plans that was suited for the Company’s most active broker-dealer clients included a fee cap that limited the potential growth in U. S.  high-grade revenue. The fee caps were set to take effect at volume levels significantly above those being transacted at the time the revised transaction fee plans were introduced. Most broker-dealer clients entered into fee arrangements with respect to the trading of U. S.  high-grade corporate bonds that included both a fixed component and a variable component. These agreements had been scheduled to expire during the third quarter of 2005. On June 1, 2005, the Company introduced a new fee plan primarily for secondary market transactions in U. S.  high-grade corporate bonds executed on its electronic trading platform. As of December 31, 2005, 17 of the Company’s U. S.  high-grade broker-dealer clients have signed new two-year agreements that supersede the fee arrangements that were entered into with many of its broker-dealer clients during the third quarter of 2003. The new plan incorporates higher fixed monthly fees and lower variable fees for brokerdealer clients than the previous U. S.  high-grade corporate transaction fee plans described above, and incorporates volume incentives to broker-dealer clients that are designed to increase the volume of transactions effected on the Company’s The U. S.  high-grade average variable transaction fee per million increased from $84 per million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $121 per million for the year ended December 31, 2008 due to the longer maturity of trades executed on the platform, for which we charge higher commissions. The Eurobond average variable transaction fee per million decreased from $138 per million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $112 per million for the year ended December 31, 2008, principally from the introduction of the new European high-grade fee plan. Other average variable transaction fee per million increased from $121 per million for the year ended December 31, 2007 to $158 per million for the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily due to a higher percentage of volume in products that carry higher fees per million, principally high-yield. Technology Products and Services. Technology products and services revenues increased by $7.8 million to $8.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily a result of the Greenline acquisition. Information and User Access Fees. Information and user access fees increased by $0.1 million or 2.5% to $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Investment Income. Investment income decreased by $1.8 million or 33.7% to $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. This decrease was primarily due to lower interest rates. Other. Other revenues decreased by $0.1 million or 4.4% to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. Expenses Our expenses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the resulting dollar and percentage changes, were as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,

	2008	2007

		% of		% of	$	%

	 $	Revenues	 $	Revenues	Change	Change

	($ in thousands)

 Expenses

Employee compensation and benefits	$43,810	47.1%	$43,051	46.0%	$759	1.8%

Depreciation and amortization	7,879	8.5	7,170	7.7	709	9.9

Technology and communications	8,311	8.9	7,463	8.0	848	11.4

Professional and consulting fees	8,171	8.8	7,639	8.2	532	7.0

Occupancy	2,891	3.1	3,275	3.5	-384	-11.7

Marketing and advertising	3,032	3.3	1,905	2.0	1,127	59.2

General and administrative	6,157	6.6	5,889	6.3	268	4.6

Total expenses	$80,251	86.2%	$76,392	81.6%	$3,859	5.1%

 $43.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $43.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. This increase was primarily attributable to higher wages of $2.4 million, severance costs of $1.0 million and stockbased compensation expense of $1.4 million, offset by reduced incentive compensation of $3.6 million. The higher wages were primarily a result of the Greenline acquisition. The total number of employees increased to 185 as of December 31, 2008 from 182 as of December 31, 2007. As a percentage of total revenues, employee compensation and benefits expense increased to 47.1% for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 46.0% for the year ended December 31, 2007. Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $0.7 million or 9.9% to $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. An increase in amortization of intangible assets of $1.3 million and the TWS impairment charge of $0.7 million were offset by a decline in depreciation and amortization of hardware and software development costs of $1.3 million. MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued) of this standard had no material effect on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and Consolidated Statements of Operations. Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ financial statements in order to conform to the current year presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income. On March 5, 2008, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Greenline Financial Technologies, Inc.  (“Greenline”), an Illinois-based provider of integration, testing and management solutions for FIX-related products and services designed to optimize electronic trading of fixed-income, equity and other exchange-based products, and approximately ten percent of the outstanding capital stock of TradeHelm, Inc. , a Delaware corporation that was spun-out from Greenline immediately prior to the acquisition. The acquisition of Greenline broadens the range of technology services that the Company offers to institutional financial markets, provides an expansion of the Company’s client base, including global exchanges and hedge funds, and further diversifies the Company’s revenues beyond the core electronic credit trading products. The results of operations of Greenline are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements from the date of the acquisition. The aggregate consideration for the Greenline acquisition was $41.1 million, comprised of $34.7 million in cash, 725,923 shares of common stock valued at $5.8 million and $0.6 million of acquisition-related costs. In addition, the sellers were eligible to receive up to an aggregate of $3.0 million in cash, subject to Greenline attaining certain earnout targets in 2008 and 2009. A total of $1.4 million was paid to the sellers in 2009 based on the 2008 earn-out target, bringing the aggregate consideration to $42.4 million. The 2009 earn-out target was not met. A total of $2.0 million of the purchase price, which had been deposited into escrow accounts to satisfy potential indemnity claims, was distributed to the sellers in March 2009. The shares of common stock issued to each selling shareholder of Greenline were released in two equal installments on December 20, 2008 and December 20, 2009, respectively. The value ascribed to the shares was discounted from the market value to reflect the non-marketability of such shares during the restriction period. The purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):

Cash	$6,406

Accounts receivable	2,139

Amortizable intangibles	8,330

Goodwill	29,405

Deferred tax assets, net	3,410

Other assets, including investment in TradeHelm	1,429

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue	-8,701

Total purchase price	$42,418

 The amortizable intangibles include $3.2 million of acquired technology, $3.3 million of customer relationships, $1.3 million of non-competition agreements and $0.5 million of tradenames. Useful lives of ten years and five years have been assigned to the customer relationships intangible and all other amortizable intangibles, respectively. The identifiable intangible assets and goodwill are not deductible for tax purposes. The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial information reflects the results of operations of the Company for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, as if the acquisition of Greenline had occurred as of the beginning of the period presented, after giving effect to certain purchase accounting adjustments. These pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what the Company’s operating results would have been had the acquisition actually taken place as of the beginning of the earliest period presented. The pro forma financial information


Answer: 2198.0

Question: What was the average amount of Total stock-based compensation for Three Months Ended Dec 31,2009,Three Months Ended Mar 31,2010,Three Months Ended Jun 30,2010? (in thousand)

Context:
(2) Includes stock-based compensation expense and asset acquisition related write-offs as follows:

	Three Months Ended

	Mar 29,2009	Jun 28,2009	Sept 30,2009	Dec 31,2009	Mar 31,2010	Jun 30,2010	Sept 30,2010	Dec 31,2010

	($ amounts in 000's)

Cost of product revenue	24	27	25	26	24	26	26	25

Cost of services revenue	124	172	169	193	208	234	242	245

Research and development	378	498	516	571	554	587	600	598

Sales and marketing	644	692	767	917	866	897	1,017	1,030

General and administrative	380	404	459	475	496	520	549	571

Total stock-based compensation	1,550	1,793	1,936	2,182	2,148	2,264	2,434	2,469

Asset acquisition related write-offs	—	631	93	1,663	—	—	—	—

Total stock based compensation and asset acquisition related write-offs	1,550	2,424	2,029	3,845	2,148	2,264	2,434	2,469

 (3) See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Seasonality, Cyclicality and Quarterly Revenue Trends Our quarterly results reflect seasonality in the sale of our products, subscriptions and services. In general, a pattern of increased customer buying at year-end has positively impacted sales activity in the fourth quarter. In the first quarter we generally experience lower sequential billings and product revenues, which results in lower product revenue. Our product revenue in the third quarter can be negatively affected by reduced economic activity in Europe during the summer months. During fiscal 2010, the growth in the Americas during the third quarter more than offset the slight decline in Europe, but this may not always be the case. Similarly, our gross margins and operating income have been affected by these historical trends because expenses are relatively fixed in the near-term. Although these seasonal factors are common in the technology sector, historical patterns should not be considered a reliable indicator of our future sales activity or performance. On a quarterly basis, we have usually generated the majority of our product revenue in the final month of each quarter and a significant amount in the last two weeks of a quarter. We believe this is due to customer buying patterns typical in this industry. Our total quarterly revenue over the past twelve quarters has increased sequentially in every quarter except for the first quarters of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009. We believe these declines in the first and third quarters of fiscal 2010 are based on seasonality as discussed above, which particularly impacts our product revenue. Product revenue in all of the quarters of fiscal 2010 was higher as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2009, which we believe was due in part to the investments made in our sales organization and improvements in overall corporate IT spending. THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES Management’s Discussion and Analysis The Risk Committee of the Board and the Risk Governance Committee approve liquidity risk limits at the firmwide level, consistent with our risk appetite statement. Limits are reviewed frequently and amended, with required approvals, on a permanent and temporary basis, as appropriate, to reflect changing market or business conditions. Our liquidity risk limits are monitored by Treasury and Liquidity Risk Management. Liquidity Risk Management is responsible for identifying and escalating to senior management and/or the appropriate risk committee, on a timely basis, instances where limits have been exceeded. GCLA and Unencumbered Metrics GCLA. Based on the results of our internal liquidity risk models, described above, as well as our consideration of other factors, including, but not limited to, an assessment of our potential intraday liquidity needs and a qualitative assessment of our condition, as well as the financial markets, we believe our liquidity position as of both December 2018 and December 2017 was appropriate. We strictly limit our GCLA to a narrowly defined list of securities and cash because they are highly liquid, even in a difficult funding environment. We do not include other potential sources of excess liquidity in our GCLA, such as less liquid unencumbered securities or committed credit facilities. The table below presents information about our average GCLA

	Average for the Year Ended December

$ in millions	 2018	2017

 Denomination

U.S. dollar	 $155,348	$155,020

Non-U.S.dollar	 77,995	63,528

 Total	 $233,343	$218,548

 Asset Class

Overnight cash deposits	 $ 98,811	$ 93,617

U.S. government obligations	 79,810	75,108

U.S. agency obligations	 12,171	11,813

Non-U.S.governmentobligations	 42,551	38,010

 Total	 $233,343	$218,548

 Entity Type

Group Inc. and Funding IHC	 $ 40,920	$ 37,507

Major broker-dealer subsidiaries	 104,364	98,160

Major bank subsidiaries	 88,059	82,881

 Total	 $233,343	$218,548

 In the table above: ‰ The U. S.  dollar-denominated GCLA consists of (i) unencumbered U. S.  government and agency obligations (including highly liquid U. S.  agency mortgage-backed obligations), all of which are eligible as collateral in Federal Reserve open market operations and (ii) certain overnight U. S.  dollar cash deposits. ‰ The non-U. S.  dollar-denominated GCLA consists of non-U. S.  government obligations (only unencumbered German, French, Japanese and U. K.  government obligations) and certain overnight cash deposits in highly liquid currencies. We maintain our GCLA to enable us to meet current and potential liquidity requirements of our parent company, Group Inc. , and its subsidiaries. Our Modeled Liquidity Outflow and Intraday Liquidity Model incorporate a consolidated requirement for Group Inc. , as well as a standalone requirement for each of our major broker-dealer and bank subsidiaries. Funding IHC is required to provide the necessary liquidity to Group Inc.  during the ordinary course of business, and is also obligated to provide capital and liquidity support to major subsidiaries in the event of our material financial distress or failure. Liquidity held directly in each of our major broker-dealer and bank subsidiaries is intended for use only by that subsidiary to meet its liquidity requirements and is assumed not to be available to Group Inc.  or Funding IHC unless (i) legally provided for and (ii) there are no additional regulatory, tax or other restrictions. In addition, the Modeled Liquidity Outflow and Intraday Liquidity Model also incorporate a broader assessment of standalone liquidity requirements for other subsidiaries and we hold a portion of our GCLA directly at Group Inc.  or Funding IHC to support such requirements. Other Unencumbered Assets. In addition to our GCLA, we have a significant amount of other unencumbered cash and financial instruments, including other government obligations, high-grade money market securities, corporate obligations, marginable equities, loans and cash deposits not included in our GCLA. The fair value of our unencumbered assets averaged $177.08 billion for 2018 and $158.41 billion for 2017. We do not consider these assets liquid enough to be eligible for our GCLA. Liquidity Regulatory Framework As a BHC, we are subject to a minimum Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) under the LCR rule approved by the U. S.  federal bank regulatory agencies. The LCR rule requires organizations to maintain an adequate ratio of eligible high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) to expected net cash outflows under an acute short-term liquidity stress scenario. Eligible HQLA excludes HQLA held by subsidiaries that is in excess of their minimum requirement and is subject to transfer restrictions. We are required to maintain a minimum LCR of 100%. We expect that fluctuations in client activity, business mix and the market environment will impact our average LCR. The table below presents information about our average daily LCR.

	Average for the Three Months Ended

$ in millions	 December 2018	September 2018

Total HQLA	 $226,473	$233,721

Eligible HQLA	 $160,016	$170,621

Net cash outflows	 $126,511	$133,126

 LCR	 127%	128%

 Liquidity and Capital Resources


Answer: 0.18193

Question: What is the growing rate of Amplifiers/Radio frequency in table 0 in the year with the most Converters in table 0?

Context:
The year-to-year increase in communications end market revenue in fiscal 2014 was primarily a result of increased wireless base station deployment activity and, to a lesser extent, an increase in revenue as a result of the Acquisition. Industrial end market revenue increased year-over-year in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 as a result of an increase in demand in this end market, which was most significant for products sold into the instrumentation and automation sectors and, to a lesser extent, an increase in revenue as a result of the Acquisition. The year-to-year increase in automotive end market revenue in fiscal 2014 was primarily a result of increasing electronic content in vehicles and higher demand for new vehicles. The year-toyear decrease in revenue in the consumer end market in fiscal 2014 was primarily the result of the sale of our microphone product line in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The year-to-year decrease in revenue in the industrial and consumer end markets in fiscal 2013 was primarily the result of a weak global economic environment and one less week of operations in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012. Automotive end market revenue increased in fiscal 2013 primarily as a result of increasing electronic content in vehicles. Revenue Trends by Product Type The following table summarizes revenue by product categories. The categorization of our products into broad categories is based on the characteristics of the individual products, the specification of the products and in some cases the specific uses that certain products have within applications. The categorization of products into categories is therefore subject to judgment in some cases and can vary over time. In instances where products move between product categories, we reclassify the amounts in the product categories for all prior periods. Such reclassifications typically do not materially change the sizing of, or the underlying trends of results within, each product category

	2014	2013	2012

	Revenue	% ofTotalProductRevenue*	Y/Y%	Revenue	% ofTotalProductRevenue*	Revenue	% ofTotalProductRevenue*

Converters	$1,285,368	45%	9%	$1,180,072	45%	$1,192,064	44%

Amplifiers/Radio frequency	806,975	28%	18%	682,759	26%	697,687	26%

Other analog	356,406	12%	-4%	372,281	14%	397,376	15%

Subtotal analog signal processing	2,448,749	85%	10%	2,235,112	85%	2,287,127	85%

Power management & reference	174,483	6%	1%	172,920	7%	182,134	7%

Total analog products	$2,623,232	92%	9%	$2,408,032	91%	$2,469,261	91%

Digital signal processing	241,541	8%	7%	225,657	9%	231,881	9%

Total Revenue	$2,864,773	100%	9%	$2,633,689	100%	$2,701,142	100%

 The sum of the individual percentages does not equal the total due to rounding. The year-to-year increase in total revenue in fiscal 2014 as compared to fiscal 2013 was the result of improving demand across most product type categories and the result of the Acquisition, which was partially offset by declines in the other analog product category, primarily as a result of the sale of our microphone product line in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013. The year-to-year decrease in total revenue in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 was the result of one less week of operations in fiscal 2013 as compared to fiscal 2012 and a broad-based decrease in demand across most product type categories. Revenue Trends by Geographic Region Revenue by geographic region, based upon the primary location of our customers' design activity for its products, for fiscal 2014, 2013 and 2012 was as follows. ANALOG DEVICES, INC.  NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Stock Options	2014	2013	2012

Options granted (in thousands)	2,240	2,407	2,456

Weighted-average exercise price	$51.52	$46.40	$39.58

Weighted-average grant-date fair value	$8.74	$7.38	$7.37

Assumptions:

Weighted-average expected volatility	24.9%	24.6%	28.4%

Weighted-average expected term (in years)	5.3	5.4	5.3

Weighted-average risk-free interest rate	1.7%	1.0%	1.1%

Weighted-average expected dividend yield	2.9%	2.9%	3.0%

 As it relates to our market-based restricted stock units, the Company utilizes the Monte Carlo simulation valuation model to value these awards. The Monte Carlo simulation model utilizes multiple input variables that determine the probability of satisfying the performance conditions stipulated in the award grant and calculates the fair market value for the market-based restricted stock units granted. The Monte Carlo simulation model also uses stock price volatility and other variables to estimate the probability of satisfying the performance conditions, including the possibility that the market condition may not be satisfied, and the resulting fair value of the award. Information pertaining to the Company's market-based restricted stock units and the related estimated assumptions used to calculate the fair value of market-based restricted stock units granted using the Monte Carlo simulation model is as follows:

Market-based Restricted Stock Units	2014

Units granted (in thousands)	86

Grant-date fair value	$50.79

Assumptions:

Historical stock price volatility	23.2%

Risk-free interest rate	0.8%

Expected dividend yield	2.8%

 Market-based restricted stock units were not granted during fiscal 2013 or 2012. Expected volatility — The Company is responsible for estimating volatility and has considered a number of factors, including third-party estimates. The Company currently believes that the exclusive use of implied volatility results in the best estimate of the grant-date fair value of employee stock options because it reflects the market’s current expectations of future volatility. In evaluating the appropriateness of exclusively relying on implied volatility, the Company concluded that: (1) options in the Company’s common stock are actively traded with sufficient volume on several exchanges; (2) the market prices of both the traded options and the underlying shares are measured at a similar point in time to each other and on a date close to the grant date of the employee share options; (3) the traded options have exercise prices that are both near-the-money and close to the exercise price of the employee share options; and (4) the remaining maturities of the traded options used to estimate volatility are at least one year. Expected term — The Company uses historical employee exercise and option expiration data to estimate the expected term assumption for the Black-Scholes grant-date valuation. The Company believes that this historical data is currently the best estimate of the expected term of a new option, and that generally its employees exhibit similar exercise behavior. Risk-free interest rate — The yield on zero-coupon U. S.  Treasury securities for a period that is commensurate with the expected term assumption is used as the risk-free interest rate. Expected dividend yield — Expected dividend yield is calculated by annualizing the cash dividend declared by the Company’s Board of Directors for the current quarter and dividing that result by the closing stock price on the date of grant. Until such time as the Company’s Board of Directors declares a cash dividend for an amount that is different from the current quarter’s cash dividend, the current dividend will be used in deriving this assumption. Cash dividends are not paid on options, restricted stock or restricted stock units. an adverse development with respect to one claim in 2008 and favorable developments in three cases in 2009. Other costs were also lower in 2009 compared to 2008, driven by a decrease in expenses for freight and property damages, employee travel, and utilities. In addition, higher bad debt expense in 2008 due to the uncertain impact of the recessionary economy drove a favorable year-over-year comparison. Conversely, an additional expense of $30 million related to a transaction with Pacer International, Inc.  and higher property taxes partially offset lower costs in 2009. Other costs were higher in 2008 compared to 2007 due to an increase in bad debts, state and local taxes, loss and damage expenses, utility costs, and other miscellaneous expenses totaling $122 million. Conversely, personal injury costs (including asbestos-related claims) were $8 million lower in 2008 compared to 2007. The reduction reflects improvements in our safety experience and lower estimated costs to resolve claims as indicated in the actuarial studies of our personal injury expense and annual reviews of asbestos-related claims in both 2008 and 2007. The year-over-year comparison also includes the negative impact of adverse development associated with one claim in 2008. In addition, environmental and toxic tort expenses were $7 million lower in 2008 compared to 2007. Non-Operating Items


Answer: 469.3

Question: What's the total amount of the Diluted: Weighted-average common shares outstanding for Denominator in the years where Total revenues for Revenues is greater than 0? (in million)

Context:
Certain property fund limited partnerships that the Company consolidates have floating rate revolving credit borrowings of $381 million as of December 31, 2009. Certain Threadneedle subsidiaries guarantee the repayment of outstanding borrowings up to the value of the assets of the partnerships. The debt is secured by the assets of the partnerships and there is no recourse to Ameriprise Financial.24. Earnings per Share Attributable to Ameriprise Financial Common Shareholders The computations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to Ameriprise Financial common shareholders are as follows:

 	 Years Ended December 31,

 	 2009	2008	 2007

 	 (in millions, except per share amounts)

 Numerator:

Net income (loss) attributable to Ameriprise Financial	$722	$-38	$814

 Denominator:

Basic: Weighted-average common shares outstanding	242.2	222.3	236.2

Effect of potentially dilutive nonqualified stock options and other share-based awards	2.2	2.6	3.7

Diluted: Weighted-average common shares outstanding	244.4	224.9	239.9

 Earnings (loss) per share attributable to Ameriprise Financial common shareholders:

Basic	$2.98	$-0.17	$3.45

Diluted	$2.95	$-0.17 (1)	$3.39

 (1) Diluted shares used in this calculation represent basic shares due to the net loss. Using actual diluted shares would result in anti-dilution. Basic weighted average common shares for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 included 3.4 million, 2.1 million and 1.6 million, respectively, of vested, nonforfeitable restricted stock units and 4.6 million, 3.1 million and 3.5 million, respectively, of non-vested restricted stock awards and restricted stock units that are forfeitable but receive nonforfeitable dividends. Potentially dilutive securities include nonqualified stock options and other share-based awards.25. Shareholders’ Equity The Company has a share repurchase program in place to return excess capital to shareholders. Since September 2008 through the date of this report, the Company has suspended its stock repurchase program; as a result there were no share repurchases during the year ended December 31, 2009. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company repurchased a total of 12.7 million and 15.9 million shares, respectively, of its common stock at an average price of $48.26 and $59.59, respectively. As of December 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $1.3 billion remaining under a share repurchase authorization. The Company may also reacquire shares of its common stock under its 2005 ICP and 2008 Plan related to restricted stock awards. Restricted shares that are forfeited before the vesting period has lapsed are recorded as treasury shares. In addition, the holders of restricted shares may elect to surrender a portion of their shares on the vesting date to cover their income tax obligations. These vested restricted shares reacquired by the Company and the Company’s payment of the holders’ income tax obligations are recorded as a treasury share purchase. The restricted shares forfeited and recorded as treasury shares under the 2005 ICP and 2008 Plan were 0.3 million shares in each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. For each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the Company reacquired 0.5 million of its common stock through the surrender of restricted shares upon vesting and paid in the aggregate $11 million, $24 million and $29 million, respectively, related to the holders’ income tax obligations on the vesting date. In 2009, the Company issued and sold 36 million shares of its common stock. The proceeds of $869 million will be used for general corporate purposes, including the Company’s pending acquisition of the long-term asset management business of Columbia, which is expected to close in the spring of 2010. See Note 5 for additional information on the Company’s pending acquisition of Columbia. In 2008, the Company reissued 1.8 million treasury shares for restricted stock award grants and the issuance of shares vested under the P2 Deferral Plan and the Transition and Opportunity Bonus (‘‘T&O Bonus’’) program. In 2005, the Company awarded bonuses to advisors General and administrative expense decreased $15 million, or 7%, to $192 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, primarily due to expense controls. Protection Our Protection segment offers a variety of protection products to address the protection and risk management needs of our retail clients including life, disability income and property-casualty insurance. Life and disability income products are primarily distributed through our branded advisors. Our property-casualty products are sold direct, primarily through affinity relationships. We issue insurance policies through our life insurance subsidiaries and the property casualty companies. The primary sources of revenues for this segment are premiums, fees, and charges that we receive to assume insurance-related risk. We earn net investment income on owned assets supporting insurance reserves and capital supporting the business. We also receive fees based on the level of assets supporting variable universal life separate account balances. This segment earns intersegment revenues from fees paid by the Asset Management segment for marketing support and other services provided in connection with the availability of RiverSource VST Funds under the variable universal life contracts. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by the Advice & Wealth Management segment, as well as expenses for investment management services provided by the Asset Management segment. The following table presents the results of operations of our Protection segment:

 	 Years Ended December 31,

 	 2009	 2008	Change

 	(in millions, except percentages)

 Revenues

Management and financial advice fees	$47	$56	$-9	-16%

Distribution fees	97	106	-9	-8

Net investment income	422	252	170	67

Premiums	1,020	994	26	3

Other revenues	386	547	-161	-29

Total revenues	1,972	1,955	17	1

Banking and deposit interest expense	1	1	—	—

Total net revenues	1,971	1,954	17	1

 Expenses

Distribution expenses	22	18	4	22

Interest credited to fixed accounts	144	144	—	—

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses	924	856	68	8

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs	159	333	-174	-52

General and administrative expense	226	251	-25	-10

Total expenses	1,475	1,602	-127	-8

Pretax income	$496	$352	$144	41%

 Our Protection segment pretax income was $496 million for 2009, an increase of $144 million, or 41%, from $352 million in 2008. Net revenues Net revenues increased $17 million, or 1%, to $2.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2009, due to an increase in net investment income and premiums, partially offset by a decrease in other revenues related to updating valuation assumptions. Net investment income increased $170 million, or 67%, to $422 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, primarily due to net realized investment gains of $27 million in 2009 compared to net realized investment losses of $92 million in the prior year primarily related to impairments of Available-for-Sale securities. In addition, investment income earned on fixed maturity securities increased $46 million compared to the prior year driven by higher yields on the longer-term investments in our fixed income investment portfolio. In December, our board of directors ratified its authorization of a stock repurchase program in the amount of 1.5 million shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2010 no shares had been repurchased. We have paid dividends for 71 consecutive years with payments increasing each of the last 19 years. We paid total dividends of $.54 per share in 2010 compared with $.51 per share in 2009. Aggregate Contractual Obligations A summary of our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010, is as follows:

(dollars in millions)	Payments due by period

Contractual Obligations	Total	Less Than1 year	1 - 3Years	3 - 5Years	More than5 years

Long-term Debt	$261.0	$18.6	$181.2	$29.2	$32.0

Fixed Rate Interest	22.4	6.1	9.0	5.1	2.2

Operating Leases	30.2	7.2	7.9	5.4	9.7

Purchase Obligations	45.5	45.5	-	-	-

Total	$359.1	$77.4	$198.1	$39.7	$43.9

 As of December 31, 2010, the liability for uncertain income tax positions was $2.7 million. Due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding timing of potential future cash flows associated with these liabilities, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the amount and period in which these liabilities might be paid. We utilize blanket purchase orders to communicate expected annual requirements to many of our suppliers. Requirements under blanket purchase orders generally do not become committed until several weeks prior to the company’s scheduled unit production. The purchase obligation amount presented above represents the value of commitments considered firm. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Our sales from continuing operations in 2010 were $1,489.3 million surpassing 2009 sales of $1,375.0 million by 8.3 percent. The increase in sales was due mostly to significantly higher sales in our water heater operations in China resulting from geographic expansion, market share gains and new product introductions as well as additional sales from our water treatment business acquired in November, 2009. Our sales from continuing operations were $1,451.3 million in 2008. The $76.3 million decline in sales from 2008 to 2009 was due to lower residential and commercial volume in North America, reflecting softness in the domestic housing market and a slowdown in the commercial water heater business and was partially offset by strong growth in water heater sales in China and improved year over year pricing. On December 13, 2010 we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our Electrical Products Company to Regal Beloit Corporation for $700 million in cash and approximately 2.83 million shares of Regal Beloit common stock. The transaction, which has been approved by both companies' board of directors, is expected to close in the first half of 2011. Due to the pending sale, our Electrical Products segment has been accorded discontinued operations treatment in the accompanying financial statements. Sales in 2010, including sales of $701.8 million for our Electrical Products segment, were $2,191.1 million. Our gross profit margin for continuing operations in 2010 was 29.9 percent, compared with 28.7 percent in 2009 and 25.8 percent in 2008. The improvement in margin from 2009 to 2010 was due to increased volume, cost containment activities and lower warranty costs which more than offset certain inefficiencies resulting from the May flood in our Ashland City, TN water heater manufacturing facility. The increase in profit margin from 2008 to 2009 resulted from increased higher margin China water heater volume, aggressive cost reduction programs and lower material costs. Selling, general and administrative expense (SG&A) was $36.9 million higher in 2010 than in 2009. The increased SG&A, the majority of which was incurred in our China water heater operation, was associated with selling costs to support higher volume and new product lines. Additional SG&A associated with our 2009 water treatment acquisition also contributed to the increase. SG&A was $8.5 million higher in 2009 than 2008 resulting mostly from an $8.2 million increase in our China water heater operation in support of higher volumes.


Answer: -0.10112

Question: what is the growth rate in advertising expense in 2003 relative to 2002?

Context:
Guarantees We adopted FASB Interpretation No.45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” at the beginning of our fiscal 2003. See “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” for further information regarding FIN 45. The lease agreements for our three office buildings in San Jose, California provide for residual value guarantees. These lease agreements were in place prior to December 31, 2002 and are disclosed in Note 14. In the normal course of business, we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement made by third parties arising from the use of our products. Historically, costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations. We have commitments to make certain milestone and/or retention payments typically entered into in conjunction with various acquisitions, for which we have made accruals in our consolidated financial statements. In connection with our purchases of technology assets during fiscal 2003, we entered into employee retention agreements totaling $2.2 million. We are required to make payments upon satisfaction of certain conditions in the agreements. As permitted under Delaware law, we have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was serving, at our request in such capacity. The indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officer’s or director’s lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. We believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal. As part of our limited partnership interests in Adobe Ventures, we have provided a general indemnification to Granite Ventures, an independent venture capital firm and sole general partner of Adobe Ventures, for certain events or occurrences while Granite Ventures is, or was serving, at our request in such capacity provided that Granite Ventures acts in good faith on behalf of the partnerships. We are unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments that could potentially result from any hypothetical future claim, but believe the risk of having to make any payments under this general indemnification to be remote. We accrue for costs associated with future obligations which include costs for undetected bugs that are discovered only after the product is installed and used by customers. The accrual remaining at the end of fiscal 2003 primarily relates to new releases of our Creative Suites products during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003. The table below summarizes the activity related to the accrual during fiscal 2003:

Balance at November 29, 2002	Accruals	Payments	Balance at November 28, 2003

$—	$5,554	$-2,369	$3,185

 Advertising Expenses We expense all advertising costs as incurred and classify these costs under sales and marketing expense. Advertising expenses for fiscal years 2003, 2002, and 2001 were $24.0 million, $26.7 million and $30.5 million, respectively. Foreign Currency and Other Hedging Instruments Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.133 (“SFAS No.133”), “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities and requires us to recognize these as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measure them at fair value. As described in Note 15, gains and losses resulting from

	Year Ended

	September 30, 2009	% Incr. (Decr.)	September 30, 2008	% Incr. (Decr.)	September 30, 2007

	($ in 000's)

Revenues

Securities Commissions and

Investment Banking Fees	$ 7,162	-78%	$ 32,292	-23%	$ 41,879

Investment Advisory Fees	1,355	-59%	3,326	30%	2,568

Interest Income	1,456	-63%	3,987	-4%	4,163

Trading Profits	4,531	341%	1,027	-80%	5,254

Other	387	-60%	975	-82%	5,340

Total Revenues	14,891	-64%	41,607	-30%	59,204

Interest Expense	421	-66%	1,235	3%	1,197

Net Revenues	14,470	-64%	40,372	-30%	58,007

Non-Interest Expense

Compensation Expense	14,381	-44%	25,860	-8%	28,010

Other Expense	7,296	-60%	18,064	-23%	23,383

Total Non-Interest Expense	21,677	-51%	43,924	-15%	51,393

Income (Loss) Before Taxes

and Minority Interest	-7,207	103%	-3,552	-154%	6,614

Minority Interest in

Pre-tax (Losses) Income Held by Others	-2,321	1,742%	-126	-104%	2,995

Pre-tax (Loss) Earnings	$ -4,886	-43%	$ -3,426	-195%	$ 3,619

 Year ended September 30, 2009 Compared with the Year ended September 30, 2008 - Emerging Markets Emerging markets in fiscal 2009 consists of the results of our joint ventures in Latin America, including Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil. The global economic slowdown and credit crisis continued to significantly impact emerging markets in all business lines. The results in the emerging market segment declined to a $4.9 million loss from a $3.4 million loss in the prior year. This decline was a result of a $24 million, or 80%, decline in commission revenues which was almost entirely offset by a $3.5 million increase in trading profits and a $22 million decline in non-interest expenses. Our minority interest partners shared in $2.3 million of the fiscal 2009 loss before taxes. In December, our joint venture in Turkey ceased operations and subsequently filed for protection under Turkish bankruptcy laws. We have fully reserved for our equity interest in this joint venture. Year ended September 30, 2008 Compared with the Year ended September 30, 2007 - Emerging Markets Emerging markets consists of the results of our joint ventures in Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil and Turkey. The results in the emerging market segment declined from a $3.6 million profit in fiscal 2007 to a $3.4 million loss in fiscal 2008. This decline was a result of a greater decline in revenues than an increase in expenses. Expenses were impacted by our investment in Brazil. The global economic slowdown and credit crisis significantly impacted emerging markets in all business lines. Commission revenue declined 23% in fiscal 2008 as compared to the prior year as the economic slowdown and a series of political crises in Turkey and Argentina during 2008 severely undermined investors’ confidence in these countries. Trading profits declined due to losses taken in proprietary positions in Turkey. The commission expense portion of compensation expense declined in proportion to the decline in commission revenue. Other expenses in fiscal 2007 were unusually high due to the accrual of tax liabilities and the related legal expenses. As of September 30, 2008, we were still awaiting the final outcome of the litigation in Turkey, and in light of the suspension of the entity’s license, our ability to continue as a going concern in Turkey was uncertain. We had fully reserved for our investment in the Turkish joint venture as of September 30, 2008 and, accordingly, fiscal 2008 pre-tax earnings did not include any net impact of our Turkish joint venture. Index 64 Certain statistical disclosures by bank holding companies As a financial holding company, we are required to provide certain statistical disclosures by bank holding companies pursuant to the SEC’s Industry Guide 3. Certain of those disclosures are as follows for the fiscal year indicated:

	Year ended September 30,

	2016	2015	2014

RJF return on average assets-1	1.8%	2.0%	2.1%

RJF return on average equity-2	11.3%	11.5%	12.3%

Average equity to average assets-3	17.1%	18.5%	18.1%

Dividend payout ratio-4	21.9%	21.0%	19.3%

 (1) Computed as net income attributable to RJF for the year indicated, divided by average assets (the sum of total assets at the beginning and end of the year, divided by two). (2) Computed by utilizing the net income attributable to RJF for the year indicated, divided by the average equity attributable to RJF for each respective fiscal year. Average equity is computed by adding the total equity attributable to RJF as of each quarter-end date during the indicated fiscal year, plus the beginning of the year total, divided by five. (3) Computed as average equity (the sum of total equity at the beginning and end of the fiscal year, divided by two), divided by average assets (the sum of total assets at the beginning and end of the fiscal year, divided by two). (4) Computed as dividends declared per common share during the fiscal year as a percentage of diluted earnings per common share. Refer to the RJ Bank section of this MD&A, various sections within Item 7A in this report and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-K for the other required disclosures. Liquidity and Capital Resources Liquidity is essential to our business. The primary goal of our liquidity management activities is to ensure adequate funding to conduct our business over a range of market environments. Senior management establishes our liquidity and capital policies. These policies include senior management’s review of shortand long-term cash flow forecasts, review of monthly capital expenditures, the monitoring of the availability of alternative sources of financing, and the daily monitoring of liquidity in our significant subsidiaries. Our decisions on the allocation of capital to our business units consider, among other factors, projected profitability and cash flow, risk and impact on future liquidity needs. Our treasury department assists in evaluating, monitoring and controlling the impact that our business activities have on our financial condition, liquidity and capital structure as well as maintains our relationships with various lenders. The objectives of these policies are to support the successful execution of our business strategies while ensuring ongoing and sufficient liquidity. Liquidity is provided primarily through our business operations and financing activities. Financing activities could include bank borrowings, repurchase agreement transactions or additional capital raising activities under our “universal” shelf registration statement. Cash used in operating activities during the year ended September 30, 2016 was $518 million. Successful operating results generated a $650 million increase in cash. Increases in cash from operations include: ? An increase in brokerage client payables had a $1.82 billion favorable impact on cash. The increase largely results from two factors. First, many clients reacted to uncertainties in the equity markets by increasing the cash balances in their brokerage accounts. Second, our brokerage client account balances increased as a result of our fiscal year 2016 acquisitions of Alex. Brown and 3Macs. Cumulatively, these two factors result in the increase in brokerage client payables and a corresponding increase in assets segregated pursuant to regulations which is discussed below.  ? Stock loaned, net of stock borrowed, increased $153 million.  ? Accrued compensation, commissions and benefits increased $46 million as a result of the increased financial results we achieved in fiscal year 2016. Offsetting these, decreases in cash used in operations resulted from: ? A $1.95 billion increase in assets segregated pursuant to regulations and other segregated assets, primarily resulting from the increase in client cash balances described above. RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued) The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic net income (loss) per common share is reconciled to shares used to calculate diluted net income (loss) per common share as follows:


Answer: 13635.25

Question: What is the average amount of Balance at December 31, 2012, and Net sales of Year Ended December 31, 2014 ?

Context:
The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s valuation allowance:

Balance at January 1, 2010	$25,621

Increases in current period tax positions	907

Decreases in current period tax positions	-2,740

Balance at December 31, 2010	$23,788

Increases in current period tax positions	1,525

Decreases in current period tax positions	-3,734

Balance at December 31, 2011	$21,579

Increases in current period tax positions	0

Decreases in current period tax positions	-2,059

Balance at December 31, 2012	$19,520

 Note 14: Employee Benefits Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits The Company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations. Benefits under the plans are based on the employee’s years of service and compensation. The pension plans have been closed for most employees hired on or after January 1, 2006. Union employees hired on or after January 1, 2001 had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement. Union employees hired on or after January 1, 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after January 1, 2006 are provided with a 5.25% of base pay defined contribution plan. The Company does not participate in a multiemployer plan. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 or the normal cost, and an additional contribution if needed to avoid “at risk” status and benefit restrictions under the Pension Protection Act of 2006. The Company may also increase its contributions, if appropriate, to its tax and cash position and the plan’s funded position. Pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed and indexed investments including equity and bond mutual funds, fixed income securities and guaranteed interest contracts with insurance companies. Pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans. (See Note 6) The Company also has several unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees. The Company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees. The retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after January 1, 2006. The plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after January 1, 2002. The Company’s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs for rate-making purposes. Plan assets are invested in equity and bond mutual funds, fixed income securities, real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and emerging market funds. The obligations of the plans are dominated by obligations for active employees. Because the timing of expected benefit payments is so far in the future and the size of the plan assets are small relative to the Company’s assets, the investment strategy is to allocate a significant percentage of assets to equities, which the Company believes will provide the highest return over the long-term period. The fixed income assets are invested in long duration debt securities and may be invested in fixed income instruments, such as futures and options in order to better match the duration of the plan liability. The allocation of goodwill in accordance with SFAS No.142 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows:

 	 Balance at Beginning of Period	 Goodwill Acquired	 Foreign Currency Translation and Other	 Balance at End of Period

Year Ended December 31, 2006

Food Packaging	$540.4	$31.9	$14.9	$587.2

Protective Packaging	1,368.4	0.4	1.1	1,369.9

Total	$1,908.8	$32.3	$16.0	$1,957.1

Year Ended December 31, 2005

Food Packaging	$549.8	$0.7	$-10.1	$540.4

Protective Packaging	1,368.2	0.8	-0.6	1,368.4

Total	$1,918.0	$1.5	$-10.7	$1,908.8

 See Note 20, “Acquisitions,” for additional information on the goodwill acquired during 2006. Note 4 Short Term Investments—Available-for-Sale Securities At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company’s available-for-sale securities consisted of auction rate securities for which interest or dividend rates are generally re-set for periods of up to 90 days. At December 31, 2006, the Company held $33.9 million of auction rate securities which were investments in preferred stock with no maturity dates. At December 31, 2005, the Company held $44.1 million of auction rate securities, of which $34.7 million were investments in preferred stock with no maturity dates and $9.4 million were investments in other auction rate securities with contractual maturities in 2031. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the fair value of the available-for-sale securities held by the Company was equal to their cost. There were no gross realized gains or losses from the sale of availablefor-sale securities in 2006 and 2005. Note 5 Accounts Receivable Securitization Program In December 2001, the Company and a group of its U. S.  subsidiaries entered into an accounts receivable securitization program with a bank and an issuer of commercial paper administered by the bank. On December 7, 2004, which was the scheduled expiration date of this program, the parties extended this program for an additional term of three years ending December 7, 2007. Under this receivables program, the Company’s two primary operating subsidiaries, Cryovac, Inc.  and Sealed Air Corporation (US), sell all of their eligible U. S.  accounts receivable to Sealed Air Funding Corporation, an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that was formed for the sole purpose of entering into the receivables program. Sealed Air Funding in turn may sell undivided ownership interests in these receivables to the bank and the issuer of commercial paper, subject to specified conditions, up to a maximum of $125.0 million of receivables interests outstanding from time to time. Sealed Air Funding retains the receivables it purchases from the operating subsidiaries, except those as to which it sells receivables interests to the bank or the issuer of commercial paper. The Company has structured the sales of accounts receivable by the operating subsidiaries to Sealed Air Funding, and the sales of receivables interests from Sealed Air Funding to the bank and the issuer of commercial paper, as “true sales” under applicable laws. The assets of Sealed Air Funding are not available to pay any creditors of the Company or of the Company’s other subsidiaries or affiliates. The Company accounts for these transactions as sales of receivables under the provisions of SFAS No.140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities. ” Product Care 2016 compared with 2015 As reported, net sales decreased $30 million, or 2%, in 2016 compared with 2015, of which $22 million was due to negative currency impact. On a constant dollar basis, net sales decreased $8 million, or 1%, in 2016 compared with 2015 primarily due to the following: ? unfavorable price/mix of $29 million primarily in North America driven by targeted pricing incentives and an unfavorable product mix related to accelerated growth in e-Commerce and a shift in demand due to more innovative, resource-efficient solutions. This was partially offset by: ? higher unit volumes of $21 million, primarily in North America and EMEA due to ongoing strength in the e-Commerce and third party logistics markets, partially offset by rationalization and weakness in the industrial sector, as well as declines in Latin America due to the political and economic environment.2015 compared with 2014 As reported, net sales decreased $109 million, or 7%, in 2015 compared with 2014, of which $99 million was due to negative currency impact. On a constant dollar basis, net sales decreased $10 million, or 1%, in 2015 compared with 2014 primarily due to the following: ? lower unit volumes due to rationalization efforts in North America, Latin America and to a lesser extent, EMEA and weaknesses across the industrial sector. This was partially offset by: ? favorable price/mix in all regions, primarily in North America and Latin America reflecting results from our focus on maintaining pricing disciplines and an increase of sales from high-performance packaging solutions, including cushioning and packaging systems as compared to sales from general packaging solutions, and the progression of our pricing and value initiatives implemented to offset non-material inflationary costs as well as currency devaluation. Cost of Sales Cost of sales for the years ended December 31, were as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,	2016 vs. 2015 % Change	2015 vs. 2014 % Change

(In millions)	2016	2015	2014

Net sales	$6,778.3	$7,031.5	$7,750.5	-3.6%	-9.3%

Cost of sales	4,246.7	4,444.9	5,062.9	-4.5%	-12.2%

As a % of net sales	62.7%	63.2%	65.3%

Gross Profit	$2,531.6	$2,586.6	$2,687.6	-2.1%	-3.8%

 2016 compared with 2015 As reported, costs of sales decreased $198 million in 2016 as compared to 2015. Cost of sales was impacted by favorable foreign currency translation of $163 million. On a constant dollar basis, cost of sales decreased $35 million primarily due to the divestiture of the North American foam trays and absorbent pads business and European food trays business of $79 million, offset by an increase of $51 million in expenses representing higher non-material manufacturing and direct costs, including salary and wage inflation, partially offset by restructuring savings and lower incentive based compensation.2015 compared with 2014 As reported, costs of sales decreased $618 million in 2015 as compared to 2014. Cost of sales was impacted by favorable foreign currency translation of $492 million. On a constant dollar basis, cost of sales decreased $126 million primarily due to the divestiture of the North American foam trays and absorbent pads business and European food trays business of $140 million and favorable impact of $31 million related to cost savings, freight, and other supply chain costs. These were partially offset by $47 million in expenses related to higher non-material manufacturing costs, including salary and wage inflation.


Answer: 670.0

Question: what are the total off-balance sheet obligations , ( in millions ) ?

Context:
The following table details the fee-paid committed and uncommitted credit lines we had available as of May 28, 2017:

 In Billions	 Facility Amount	 Borrowed Amount

Credit facility expiring:

May 2022	$2.7	$—

June 2019	0.2	0.1

Total committed credit facilities	2.9	0.1

Uncommitted credit facilities	0.5	0.1

Total committed and uncommitted credit facilities	$3.4	$0.2

 In fiscal 2016, we entered into a $2.7 billion fee-paid committed credit facility that was originally scheduled to expire in May 2021. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 we amended the credit facility’s expiration date by one year to May 2022. To ensure availability of funds, we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding notes payable. Commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing. We have commercial paper programs available to us in the United States and Europe. We also have uncommitted and asset-backed credit lines that support our foreign operations. The credit facilities contain several covenants, including a requirement to maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 2.5 times. Certain of our long-term debt agreements, our credit facilities, and our noncontrolling interests contain restrictive covenants. As of May 28, 2017, we were in compliance with all of these covenants. We have $605 million of long-term debt maturing in the next 12 months that is classified as current, including $500 million of 1.4 percent notes due October 2017 and $100 million of 6.39 percent fixed rate medium term notes due for remarketing in February 2018. We believe that cash flows from operations, together with available short- and long-term debt financing, will be adequate to meet our liquidity and capital needs for at least the next 12 months. As of May 28, 2017, our total debt, including the impact of derivative instruments designated as hedges, was 67 percent in fixed-rate and 33 percent in floating-rate instruments, compared to 78 percent in fixedrate and 22 percent in floating-rate instruments on May 29, 2016. Return on average total capital was 12.7 percent in fiscal 2017 compared to 12.9 percent in fiscal 2016. Improvement in adjusted return on average total capital is one of our key performance measures (see the “NonGAAP Measures” section below for our discussion of this measure, which is not defined by GAAP). Adjusted return on average total capital increased 30 basis points from 11.3 percent in fiscal 2016 to 11.6 percent in fiscal 2017 as fiscal 2017 adjusted earnings increased. On a constant-currency basis, adjusted return on average total capital increased 40 basis points. We also believe that our fixed charge coverage ratio and the ratio of operating cash flow to debt are important measures of our financial strength. Our fixed charge coverage ratio in fiscal 2017 was 7.26 compared to 7.40 in fiscal 2016. The measure decreased from fiscal 2016 as earnings before income taxes and after-tax earnings from joint ventures decreased by $132 million in fiscal 2017. Our operating cash flow to debt ratio decreased 6.8 percentage points to 24.4 percent in fiscal 2017, driven by a decrease in cash provided by operations and an increase in notes payable. We have a 51 percent controlling interest in Yoplait SAS and a 50 percent interest in Yoplait Marques SNC and Liberté Marques Sàrl. Sodiaal holds the remaining interests in each of these entities. We consolidate these entities into our consolidated financial statements. We record Sodiaal’s 50 percent interest in Yoplait Marques SNC and Liberté Marques Sàrl as noncontrolling interests, and its 49 percent interest in Yoplait SAS as a redeemable interest on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. These euro- and Canadian dollar-denominated interests are reported in U. S.  dollars on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Sodiaal has the ability to put all or a portion of its redeemable interest to us at fair value once per year, up to three times before December 2024. As of May 28, 2017, the redemption value of the redeemable interest was $911 million which approximates its fair value. The third-party holder of the General Mills Cereals, LLC (GMC) Class A Interests receives quarterly preferred distributions from available net income based on the application of a floating preferred return rate to the holder’s capital account balance established in the most recent mark-to-market valuation (currently $252 million). On June 1, 2015, the floating preferred return rate on GMC’s Class A Interests was reset to the sum of three-month LIBOR plus 125 basis points. The preferred return rate is adjusted every three years through a negotiated agreement with the Class A Interest holder or through a remarketing auction. We have an option to purchase the Class A Interests for consideration equal to the then current capital account value, plus any unpaid preferred return and the prescribed make-whole amount. If we purchase these interests, any change in the third-party holder’s capital account from its original value will be charged directly to retained earnings and will increase or decrease the net earnings used to calculate EPS in that period. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS As of May 28, 2017, we have issued guarantees and comfort letters of $505 million for the debt and other obligations of consolidated subsidiaries, and guarantees and comfort letters of $165 million for the debt and other obligations of non-consolidated affiliates, mainly CPW. In addition, off-balance sheet arrangements are generally limited to the future payments under non-cancelable operating leases, which totaled $501 million as of May 28, 2017. As of May 28, 2017, we had invested in five variable interest entities (VIEs). None of our VIEs are material to our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity as of and for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2017. Our defined benefit plans in the United States are subject to the requirements of the Pension Protection Act (PPA). In the future, the PPA may require us to make additional contributions to our domestic plans. We do not expect to be required to make any contributions in fiscal 2017. The following table summarizes our future estimated cash payments under existing contractual obligations, including payments due by period:

	 Payments Due by Fiscal Year

 In Millions	Total	2018	2019 -20	2021 -22	2023 and Thereafter

Long-term debt (a)	$8,290.6	604.2	2,647.7	1,559.3	3,479.4

Accrued interest	83.8	83.8	—	—	—

Operating leases (b)	500.7	118.8	182.4	110.4	89.1

Capital leases	1.2	0.4	0.6	0.1	0.1

Purchase obligations (c)	3,191.0	2,304.8	606.8	264.3	15.1

Total contractual obligations	12,067.3	3,112.0	3,437.5	1,934.1	3,583.7

Other long-term obligations (d)	1,372.7	—	—	—	—

Total long-term obligations	$13,440.0	$3,112.0	$3,437.5	$1,934.1	$3,583.7

 (a) Amounts represent the expected cash payments of our long-term debt and do not include $1.2 million for capital leases or $44.4 million for net unamortized debt issuance costs, premiums and discounts, and fair value adjustments. (b) Operating leases represents the minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases. (c) The majority of the purchase obligations represent commitments for raw material and packaging to be utilized in the normal course of business and for consumer marketing spending commitments that support our brands. For purposes of this table, arrangements are considered purchase obligations if a contract specifies all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased, a pricing structure, and approximate timing of the transaction. Most arrangements are cancelable without a significant penalty and with short notice (usually 30 days). Any amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as accounts payable and accrued liabilities are excluded from the table above. (d) The fair value of our foreign exchange, equity, commodity, and grain derivative contracts with a payable position to the counterparty was $24 million as of May 28, 2017, based on fair market values as of that date. Future changes in market values will impact the amount of cash ultimately paid or received to settle those instruments in the future. Other long-term obligations mainly consist of liabilities for accrued compensation and benefits, including the underfunded status of certain of our defined benefit pension, other postretirement benefit, and postemployment benefit plans, and miscellaneous liabilities. We expect to pay $21 million of benefits from our unfunded postemployment benefit plans and $14.6 million of deferred compensation in fiscal 2018. We are unable to reliably estimate the amount of these payments beyond fiscal 2018. As of May 28, 2017, our total liability for uncertain tax positions and accrued interest and penalties was $158.6 million. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES For a complete description of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 51 of this report. Our significant accounting estimates are those that have a meaningful impact on the reporting of our financial condition and results of operations. These estimates include our accounting for promotional expenditures, valuation of long-lived assets, intangible assets, redeemable interest, stock-based compensation, income taxes, and defined benefit pension, other postretirement benefit, and postemployment benefit plans. Promotional Expenditures Our promotional activities are conducted through our customers and directly or indirectly with end consumers. These activities include: payments to customers to perform merchandising activities on our behalf, such as advertising or in-store displays; discounts to our list prices to lower retail shelf prices; payments to gain distribution of new products; coupons, contests, and other incentives; and media and advertising expenditures. The recognition of these costs requires estimation of customer participation and performance levels. These estimates are based


Answer: 8703.0

Question: What was the total amount of the adjusted profit in the years / sections where profit of profit before taxes is greater than 5000? (in million)

Context:
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our discussion of cautionary statements and significant risks to the company’s business under Item 1A. Risk Factors of the 2018 Form?10-K.  OVERVIEW Our sales and revenues for 2018 were $54.722 billion, a 20?percent increase from 2017 sales and revenues of $45.462?billion. The increase was primarily due to higher sales volume, mostly due to improved demand across all regions and across the three primary segments. Profit per share for 2018 was $10.26, compared to profit per share of $1.26 in 2017. Profit was $6.147 billion in 2018, compared with $754 million in 2017. The increase was primarily due to lower tax expense, higher sales volume, decreased restructuring costs and improved price realization. The increase was partially offset by higher manufacturing costs and selling, general and administrative (SG&A) and research and development (R&D) expenses and lower profit from the Financial Products Segment. Fourth-quarter 2018 sales and revenues were $14.342 billion, up $1.446 billion, or 11 percent, from $12.896 billion in the fourth quarter of 2017. Fourth-quarter 2018 profit was $1.78 per share, compared with a loss of $2.18 per share in the fourth quarter of 2017. Fourth-quarter 2018 profit was $1.048 billion, compared with a loss of $1.299 billion in 2017. Highlights for 2018 include: z Sales and revenues in 2018 were $54.722 billion, up 20?percent from 2017. Sales improved in all regions and across the three primary segments. z Operating profit as a percent of sales and revenues was 15.2?percent in 2018, compared with 9.8 percent in 2017. Adjusted operating profit margin was 15.9 percent in 2018, compared with 12.5 percent in 2017.  z Profit was $10.26 per share for 2018, and excluding the items in the table below, adjusted profit per share was $11.22. For 2017 profit was $1.26 per share, and excluding the items in the table below, adjusted profit per share was $6.88.  z In order for our results to be more meaningful to our readers, we have separately quantified the impact of several significant items:

	Full Year 2018	Full Year 2017

(Millions of dollars)	Profit Before Taxes	ProfitPer Share	Profit Before Taxes	ProfitPer Share

Profit	$7,822	$10.26	$4,082	$1.26

Restructuring costs	386	0.50	1,256	1.68

Mark-to-market losses	495	0.64	301	0.26

Deferred tax valuation allowance adjustments	—	-0.01	—	-0.18

U.S. tax reform impact	—	-0.17	—	3.95

Gain on sale of equity investment	—	—	-85	-0.09

Adjusted profit	$8,703	$11.22	$5,554	$6.88

 z Machinery, Energy & Transportation (ME&T) operating cash flow for 2018 was about $6.3 billion, more than sufficient to cover capital expenditures and dividends. ME&T operating cash flow for 2017 was about $5.5 billion. Restructuring Costs In recent years, we have incurred substantial restructuring costs to achieve a flexible and competitive cost structure. During 2018, we incurred $386 million of restructuring costs related to restructuring actions across the company. During 2017, we incurred $1.256 billion of restructuring costs with about half related to the closure of the facility in Gosselies, Belgium, and the remainder related to other restructuring actions across the company. Although we expect restructuring to continue as part of ongoing business activities, restructuring costs should be lower in 2019 than 2018. Notes: z Glossary of terms included on pages 33-34; first occurrence of terms shown in bold italics. z Information on non-GAAP financial measures is included on pages 42-43. Recognition of finance revenue and rental revenue is suspended and the account is placed on non-accrual status when management determines that collection of future income is not probable (generally after 120 days past due). Recognition is resumed, and previously suspended income is recognized, when the account becomes current and collection of remaining amounts is considered probable. See Note 7 for more information. Revenues are presented net of sales and other related taxes.3. Stock-Based Compensation Our stock-based compensation plans primarily provide for the granting of stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based restricted stock units (PRSUs) to Officers and other key employees, as well as non-employee Directors. Stock options permit a holder to buy Caterpillar stock at the stock’s price when the option was granted. SARs permit a holder the right to receive the value in shares of the appreciation in Caterpillar stock that occurred from the date the right was granted up to the date of exercise. RSUs are agreements to issue shares of Caterpillar stock at the time of vesting. PRSUs are similar to RSUs and include performance conditions in the vesting terms of the award. Our long-standing practices and policies specify that all stockbased compensation awards are approved by the Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the Board of Directors. The award approval process specifies the grant date, value and terms of the award. The same terms and conditions are consistently applied to all employee grants, including Officers. The Committee approves all individual Officer grants. The number of stock-based compensation award units included in an individual’s award is determined based on the methodology approved by the Committee. The exercise price methodology?approved by the Committee is the closing price of the Company stock on the date of the grant. In June of 2014, shareholders approved the Caterpillar Inc.  2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) under which all new stock-based compensation awards are granted. In June of 2017, the Plan was amended and restated. The Plan initially provided that up to 38,800,000 Common Shares would be reserved for future issuance under the Plan, subject to adjustment in certain events. Subsequent to the shareholder approval of the amendment and restatement of the Plan, an additional 36,000,000 Common Shares became available for all awards under the Plan. Common stock issued from Treasury stock under the plans totaled 5,590,641 for 2018, 11,139,748 for 2017 and 4,164,134 for 2016. The total number of shares authorized for equity awards under the amended and restated Caterpillar Inc.  2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan is 74,800,000, of which 44,139,162 shares remained available for issuance as of December?31,?2018. Stock option and RSU awards generally vest according to a threeyear graded vesting schedule. One-third of the award will become vested on the first anniversary of the grant date, one-third of the award will become vested on the second anniversary of the grant date and one-third of the award will become vested on the third anniversary of the grant date. PRSU awards generally have a threeyear performance period and cliff vest at the end of the period based upon achievement of performance targets established at the time of grant. Upon separation from service, if the participant is 55 years of age or older with more than five years of service, the participant meets the criteria for a “Long Service Separation. ” Award terms for awards granted in 2016 allow for immediate vesting upon separation of all outstanding options and RSUs with no requisite service period for employees who meet the criteria for a “Long Service Separation. ” Compensation expense for the 2016 grant was fully recognized immediately on the grant date for these employees. Award terms for the 2018 and 2017 grants allow for continued vesting as of each vesting date specified in the award document for employees who meet the criteria for a “Long Service Separation” and fulfill a requisite service period of six months. Compensation expense for eligible employees for the 2018 and 2017 grants was recognized over the period from the grant date to the end date of the six-month requisite service period. For employees who become eligible for a “Long Service Separation” subsequent to the end date of the six-month requisite service period and prior to the completion of the vesting period, compensation expense is recognized over the period from the grant date to the date eligibility is achieved. At grant, SARs and option awards have a term life of ten years. For awards granted prior to 2016, if the “Long Service Separation” criteria are met, the vested options/SARs have a life that is the lesser of ten years from the original grant date or five years from the separation date. For awards granted in 2018, 2017, and 2016, the vested options have a life equal to ten years from the original grant date. Prior to 2017, all outstanding PRSU awards granted to employees eligible for a “Long Service Separation” may vest at the end of the performance period based upon achievement of the performance target. Compensation expense for the 2016 PRSU grant was fully recognized immediately on the grant date for these employees. For PRSU awards granted in 2018 and 2017, only a prorated number of shares may vest at the end of the performance period based upon achievement of the performance target, with the proration based upon the number of months of continuous employment during the three-year performance period. Employees with a “Long Service Separation” must also fulfill a six-month requisite service period in order to be eligible for the prorated vesting of outstanding PRSU awards granted in 2018 and 2017. Compensation expense for the 2018 and 2017 PRSU grants is being recognized on a straight-line basis over the three-year performance period for all participants. Accounting guidance on share-based payments requires companies to estimate the fair value of options/SARs on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The fair value of our option/SAR grants was estimated using a lattice-based option-pricing model. The latticebased option-pricing model considers a range of assumptions related to volatility, risk-free interest rate and historical employee behavior. Expected volatility was based on historical Caterpillar stock price movement and current implied volatilities from traded options on Caterpillar stock. The risk-free interest rate was based on U. S.  Treasury security yields at the time of grant. The weighted-average dividend yield was based on historical information. The expected life was determined from the lattice-based model. The latticebased model incorporated exercise and post vesting forfeiture assumptions based on analysis of historical data. The following table provides the assumptions used in determining the fair value of the Option/SAR awards for the years ended December?31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

	Grant Year

	2018	2017	2016

Weighted-average dividend yield	2.7%	3.4%	3.2%

Weighted-average volatility	30.2%	29.2%	31.1%

Range of volatilities	21.5-33.0%	22.1-33.0%	22.5-33.4%

Range of risk-free interest rates	2.02-2.87%	0.81-2.35%	0.62-1.73%

Weighted-average expected lives	8 years	8 years	8 years


Answer: 0.08923

Question: In the year with lowest amount of Other analog, what's the increasing rate of Converters?


Answer: 0.73759

Question: what portion of the company's property is located in united states?

Context:
Item 2: Properties Information concerning Applied’s properties is set forth below:

(Square feet in thousands)	United States	Other Countries	Total

Owned	3,964	1,652	5,616

Leased	845	1,153	1,998

Total	4,809	2,805	7,614

 Because of the interrelation of Applied’s operations, properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country. The Company’s headquarters offices are in Santa Clara, California. Products in Semiconductor Systems are manufactured in Santa Clara, California; Austin, Texas; Gloucester, Massachusetts; Kalispell, Montana; Rehovot, Israel; and Singapore. Remanufactured equipment products in the Applied Global Services segment are produced primarily in Austin, Texas. Products in the Display and Adjacent Markets segment are manufactured in Alzenau, Germany; and Tainan, Taiwan. Other products are manufactured in Treviso, Italy. Applied also owns and leases offices, plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world, including in Europe, Japan, North America (principally the United States), Israel, China, India, Korea, Southeast Asia and Taiwan. These facilities are principally used for manufacturing; research, development and engineering; and marketing, sales and customer support. Applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in Montana, Texas, California, Israel and Italy that could accommodate additional building space. Applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements. Applied regularly assesses the size, capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. General and administrative expense, which excludes integration charges, decreased $42 million, or 3%, to $1.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $1.3 billion for the prior year primarily due to continued expense controls, partially offset by an increase of approximately $19 million related to higher performance fee-related compensation. Annuities Our Annuities segment provides variable and fixed annuity products of RiverSource Life companies to individual clients. We provide our variable annuity products through our advisors, and fixed annuity products are provided through both affiliated and unaffiliated advisors and financial institutions. Revenues for our variable annuity products are primarily earned as fees based on underlying account balances, which are impacted by both market movements and net asset flows. Revenues for our fixed annuity products are primarily earned as net investment income on assets supporting fixed account balances, with profitability significantly impacted by the spread between net investment income earned and interest credited on the fixed account balances. We also earn net investment income on owned assets supporting reserves for immediate annuities and for certain guaranteed benefits offered with variable annuities and on capital supporting the business. Intersegment revenues for this segment reflect fees paid by our Asset Management segment for marketing support and other services provided in connection with the availability of variable insurance trust funds (‘‘VIT Funds’’) under the variable annuity contracts. Intersegment expenses for this segment include distribution expenses for services provided by our Advice & Wealth Management segment, as well as expenses for investment management services provided by our Asset Management segment. The following table presents the results of operations of our Annuities segment on an operating basis:

 	 Years Ended December 31,

 	 2012	 2011	Change

 	(in millions)

 Revenues

Management and financial advice fees	$648	$622	$26	4%

Distribution fees	317	312	5	2

Net investment income	1,132	1,279	-147	-11

Premiums	118	161	-43	-27

Other revenues	309	256	53	21

Total revenues	2,524	2,630	-106	-4

Banking and deposit interest expense	—	—	—	—

Total net revenues	2,524	2,630	-106	-4

 Expenses

Distribution expenses	395	400	-5	-1

Interest credited to fixed accounts	688	714	-26	-4

Benefits, claims, losses and settlement expenses	419	405	14	3

Amortization of deferred acquisition costs	229	264	-35	-13

Interest and debt expense	2	1	1	NM

General and administrative expense	224	221	3	1

Total expenses	1,957	2,005	-48	-2

Operating earnings	$567	$625	$-58	-9%

 NM Not Meaningful. Our Annuities segment pretax operating income, which excludes net realized gains or losses and the market impact on variable annuity guaranteed living benefits (net of hedges and the related DSIC and DAC amortization), decreased $58 million, or 9%, to $567 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $625 million for the prior year primarily due to a decline in net investment income and an unfavorable impact from unlocking and model changes, partially offset by the market impact on DAC and DSIC, lower interest credited to fixed accounts and higher fee revenues. Results for 2011 included $34 million of additional bond discount accretion investment income related to prior periods resulting from revisions to the accounting classification of certain structured securities, net of DAC and DSIC amortization. The impact of unlocking and model changes was a decrease to pretax operating income of $11 million in 2012 compared to an increase of $1 million in the prior year. The impact of unlocking and model changes for 2012 included a $43 million benefit, net of DAC and DSIC amortization, from an adjustment to the model which values the reserves related to living benefit guarantees primarily attributable to prior periods. This revision aligns the model to more accurately reflect best estimate assumptions for living benefit utilization going forward. The market impact on DAC and DSIC was a benefit of $29 million in 2012 compared to an expense of $10 million in the prior year. RiverSource variable annuity account balances increased 9% to $68.1 billion at December 31, 2012 compared to the prior year driven by market appreciation. Variable annuity net outflows of $457 million in 2012 reflected the closed book Note 5. Long-Term Obligations Long-Term Obligations consist of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,

	2012	2011

Senior secured credit agreement:

Term loans payable	$420,625	$240,625

Revolving credit facility	553,964	660,730

Receivables securitization facility	80,000	—

Notes payable through October 2018 at weighted average interest rates of 1.7% and 2.0%, respectively	42,398	38,338

Other long-term debt at weighted average interest rates of 3.3% and 3.2%, respectively	21,491	16,383

	1,118,478	956,076

Less current maturities	-71,716	-29,524

	$1,046,762	$926,552

 The scheduled maturities of long-term obligations outstanding at December 31, 2012 are as follows (in thousands):